Latin King Member Guilty for Racketeering Enterprise





On October 4, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey announced that a Union County man admitted his role in robbing the bank where he worked, the TD Bank branch in Westfield, New Jersey. The man’s name is Jelani Bustamonte, and he was arrested at his home on January 26, 2012.
According to court documents, the first conspiracy involved a plan to rob bank tellers at the TD Bank in Westfield. A second conspiracy involved a plan to rob the vault inside the same bank. While planning the schemes, Bustamonte admitted to providing information about the layout of the bank, the bank’s security, and business operations occurring in the bank.
The co-conspirator was Julio Ferrer, who pleaded guilty to robbing the TD Bank brand in Westfield. He also admitted to robbing six other branches of the TD Bank throughout New Jersey from October 2011 to December 2011.
The robbery at the TD Bank branch in Westfield occurred on September 11, 2011 at 2:21 p.m. Ferrer enter the bank on 560 North Avenue East and proceeded to pass a deposit slip across the counter. The teller was counting money at the time and returned the slip back to Ferrer after they failed to see the handwriting on the slip or the requested monetary amount. Ferrer pushed the slip back across the counter and stated, “read it.” The note stated, “I want all the money lose (sic) bills.” The teller stepped back and Ferrer grabbed all of the money the teller was counting.
Bustamonte told authorities he discussed how to rob the vault with Ferrer and several other people. In return, he was going to receive $50,000. He also told Ferrer to ask for “loose bills” instead of strapped money.
Bustamonte faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a fine up to $250,000. He will be sentenced on February 5, 2013.
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

On October 5, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania announced that Louis Fazzini of Caldwell, New Jersey, pleaded guilty to an illegal gambling racketeering conspiracy and theft from an employee benefit plan. Fazzini admitted to being a “made” member of the North Jersey crew of the La Cosa Nostra Family.
As a member of the Family, he admitted that he operated an illegal sports bookmaking business. Additionally, he admitted to devising a scheme in order to obtain health benefits by an operating a “no show” job that was controlled by the La Cosa Nostra. A “now show” employee does not perform any work or productive service but still receive health benefits.
Mr. Fazzini was one of 14 members of the Philadelphia La Cosa Nostra Family charged for crimes that involved conspiracy, extortion, loan sharking, illegal gambling, witness tampering, and theft a benefit plan. The other members include Josepha Ligambi (the LCN Family boss), Josepha Massimino (the underboss), George Borgesi, Martin Angelina, Anthony Staino, Gaeton Lucibello, Damion Canalichio, Louis Barretta, Gary Battglini, Robert Verrecchia, Eric Esposito, Robert Ranieri, and Johseph Licata.
The FBI reports that Lucibello was sentenced to 51 months in prison for racketeering conspiracy. Mr. Angelina was sentenced to 57 months for racketeering conspiracy, and Barretta was sentenced to 33 months for racketeering conspiracy as well.
Ligambi, Massimino, Borgesi, Staino, Canalichio, Battaglini, and Licata will receive their trial on October 9, 2012. The rest of the men are still awaiting a trial date.
The case was investigated by the FBI, the Criminal Investigation section of the IRS, the Pennsylvania State Police, the New Jersey State Police, the Philadelphia Police Department, the Inspector General Office of Labor Racketeering and Fraud Investigations under the U.S. Department of Labor, and the Employee Benefits Security Administration under the U.S. Department of Labor.
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

On October 4, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey announced that George Chrysanthopoulos of Little Silver, New Jersey was indicted for paying $350,000 in kickbacks to the New Jersey Department of Transportation and a private port terminal operator as well. He is believed to have paid the kickbacks and bribes in order to receive construction contracts worth millions of dollars.
According to the indictment, Chrysanthopoulos paid cash bribes to a private terminal operator in Port Elizabeth between the years of 2002 and 2008 in order to obtain construction contracts for his company, Tarheel Enterprises Inc. Chrysanthopoulos agreed to pay the employee $20,000 for every $5 million that Tarheel made from the terminal operator.
The same employee began working with law enforcement and he arranged meetings with Chrysanthopoulos between February 2011 and April 2011. During the meetings, the employee and Chrysanthopoulos discussed the kickbacks and about $150 million in construction projects. The following statement was recorded: “We could do the same thing like we did last time, George…like for every $5 million, I get 20 grand, boom…I’ll be happy, man.” Chrysanthopoulos responded with the following statement: “I know what the parameters are…20 per give.”
During the same meeting, Chrysanthopoulos gave names of bidders that would be invited to a 2011 project bid. The FBI reports that Chrysanthopoulos paid about $48,000 in bribes to a NJDOT engineer in order to receive the engineer’s influence for $44 million contract that was eventually awarded to Tarheel.
Chrysanthopoulos faces a combined maximum sentence of 100 years in prison. He also faces a $250,000 penalty for each count of mail and wire fraud. Prosecutors are asking that Chrysanthopoulos forfeit $17 million of the proceeds.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Harvey Bartle is prosecuting this case.
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

On October 5, 2012, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that 44 people were arrested in eastern Puerto for participation in a drug trafficking and money laundering organization. The sting was conducted by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) under the ICE, the Puerto Rico Police Department, and the DEA.
The indictment stated that Julio L. De Jesus-Gomez, Tania De Jesus-Gomez and Julia Gomez-Calcaño all tried to launder profits from drug trafficking into Luquillo Boat Glass Inc. The ICE reports that the three defendants bought real estate and other assets by falsifying the source of money. Purchases included $75,000 for land, $265,000 for property in Fajardo, and more.
Tania De Jesus-Gomez and Julia Gomez-Calcaño were also indicted for tampering with a witness. The ICE reports that the two defendants told a witness how to respond to law enforcement if the authorities asked questions about the purchases.
Angel Melendez, the Acting Special Agent in Charge for HIS San Juan, stated: “This case exemplifies that those involved in money laundering and the importation of narcotics and other contraband into and out of our country will be vigorously investigated and prosecuted. HSI thanks out local, state and federal law enforcement partners for their significant cooperation in dismantling this narcotics and money laundering organization.”
All 44 defendants face a charge for conspiracy to commit drug trafficking. Some of the members used private boats and boats from the Puerto Rico Maritime Transportation Authority to smuggle large amounts of cocaine and heroin throughout Puerto Rico. 23 of the defendants face additional charges for carrying firearms in connection with the drug trafficking.
In total, the ICE reports that three leaders, one manager, six drug point owners, four enforcers, one supplier, ten runners, two drug processors, and twenty-four distributors have been charged.
Source: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

On November 29, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Hampshire announced that David M Kwiatkowski was indicted for infecting patients in New Hampshire and other states with Hepatitis C. He is a former Exeter Hospital employee.
According to the indictment, Kwiatkowski worked in Michigan as a health care worker and became a traveling health care technician in 2007. He worked in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Arizona, Kansas, Georgia, and New Hampshire.
Kwiatkowski knew he was infected with Hepatitis C since at least June 2010, and he started working for Exeter Hospital in April 2011.
While working at Exeter Hospital, Kwiatkowski stole the controlled substance fentanyl—which has analgesic effects. He knew when a patient was going to undergo a medical procedure, and he replaced the syringes of fentanyl with syringes of saline. The syringes filled with saline were originally filled with fentanyl, but Kwiatkowski used the syringes himself before refilling them with saline—thus tainting the syringes before they were used on patients.
Over 30 people became infected from Kwiatkowski’s Hepatitis C virus in New Hampshire and other states. He was arrested on July 19, 2012.
Hepatitis C is a blood-borne virus that is capable of causing serious liver damage. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) state that Hepatitis C kills more people in the United States every year than HIV.
Kwiatkowski is charged with seven counts of tampering with a consumer product and seven counts of fraudulently obtaining controlled substances. He faces up to 10 years in prison on each tampering charge and up to four years in prison on each count of obtaining controlled substances. Each count is punishable with a $250,000 fine as well.
The investigation is still ongoing. Kwiatkowski remains innocent until proven guilty.
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation


Introduction
Megan’s Law is a critical piece of legislation that plays a pivotal role in safeguarding communities across the United States from sexual offenders. Each state in the U.S. has its own version of Megan’s Law, aimed at monitoring and regulating the activities of individuals convicted of sexual offenses. In this article, we will delve into the specifics of Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law, exploring its history, objectives, implementation, and the resources available for public awareness and safety. To ensure accuracy and credibility, we will primarily rely on information from government resources.
Megan’s Law is named after Megan Kanka, a young girl from New Jersey who was tragically sexually assaulted and murdered by a neighbor who was a previously convicted sex offender. Her death in 1994 was a wake-up call that highlighted the need for greater community awareness and protection against sexual predators.
Pennsylvania, like many other states, responded to this tragic event by enacting its own version of Megan’s Law. The primary objectives of Megan’s Law in Pennsylvania include:
Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law is a comprehensive and multifaceted system designed to track, register, and manage individuals convicted of sexual offenses. The key components of its implementation include:
III. Megan’s Law and Constitutional Considerations
While Megan’s Law has been instrumental in enhancing community safety, it has also raised constitutional questions and concerns, particularly regarding privacy and due process rights. Some individuals argue that the public shaming associated with community notification may infringe upon the constitutional rights of sex offenders who have completed their sentences and paid their debt to society.
The U.S. Supreme Court addressed these concerns in the case of Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe (2003). In this case, the Court upheld the constitutionality of Megan’s Law-type statutes but also emphasized the importance of individualized risk assessment and periodic review.
Pennsylvania has made efforts to address these constitutional concerns by implementing a tiered system that takes into account the risk level posed by individual offenders. This approach is designed to balance public safety with the rights of the convicted.
Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law places a strong emphasis on public awareness and community safety. To facilitate this, the state provides various resources to help residents stay informed and take proactive measures:
Megan’s Law in Pennsylvania, like in many other states, has evolved over the years to address emerging challenges and adapt to changes in technology. Some notable developments and considerations include:
Conclusion
Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law is a vital tool in the ongoing efforts to protect communities from sexual offenders. Its emphasis on community notification, tiered risk assessment, and public resources for awareness and safety make it a comprehensive and dynamic system. While it is not without its constitutional and logistical challenges, Pennsylvania continues to refine and adapt its Megan’s Law to ensure the safety and well-being of its residents. As the landscape of sexual offender management evolves, Megan’s Law in Pennsylvania will likely continue to play a central role in community safety.
PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW is essentially an adjunct to the NATIONAL MEGAN’S LAW that was put into effect by then President Bill Clinton in 1996. In 1995 then Governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Ridge, introduced legislation to protect the citizens of Pennsylvania from the threat of registered sex offenders living within the State. The bill became active in April of 1996. PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGANS LAW, which was signed as Act 24 of 1995 imposes a number of criteria upon registered sex offenders.
WHAT DOES PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW REQUIRE OF SEX OFFENDERS?
The PENNSYLVANIA MEGAN’S LAW allows sentencing courts to impose life sentences on those sexually violent offenders who are deemed to be “predators.” PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW also requires sex offenders and sexually violent predators to register with the Pennsylvania State Police. It also stipulated that communities be notified when and where a sexually violent predator moves into an area.
WHAT ARE THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS?
The State of Pennsylvania requires sex offenders, as per PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW to register with the State Police Department for a period of time upon their release from prison. The State breaks up the requirements to 10 years of registration to Life registration.
The requirement of 10 year registration is reserved for crimes including: kidnapping of a minor, luring a child into a motor vehicle, incest where the victim is over 12 years of age, obscene and other sexual materials where the victim is a minor, sexual abuse of children, unlawful contact with a minor, and a list of others that may be found at www.pameganslaw.state.pa.us.
The requirement of life registration is reserved for crimes including: offenders with two or more convictions of any of the offenses set forth in the 10 year registration requirement, rape, sexual assault, incest where the victim is under 12 years of age and offenders considered sexually violent predators. For a full list of the offenses that require lifetime registration see www.pameganslaw.state.pa.us.
WHAT INFORMATION DOES PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW PROVIDE CITIZENS?
Pennsylvania seems to take a stricter stance on the amount of information that a sex offender living within the State must provide. This data include:
· Name and all known aliases;
· Year of birth;
· Street address, city, municipality, county, zip code and all residences, and where applicable the name of the prison or other place of confinement;
· Name, address and all other information associated with an offenders school or employment;
· Physical description of the offender, including photos;
· Identification marks;
· License plate numbers and descriptions of vehicles;
· Current registry compliance status;
· Whether the victim of the offense was a minor;
· A description of the offense;
· Date of conviction;
· A map of where the offender lived and attends school, if applicable.
DOES PENNSYLVANIA RESTRICT THE LOCATION WHERE A SEX OFFENDER MAY LIVE?
PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW does not restrict where a registered sex offender may reside. The exception to the rule is that a registered sex offender may not live near a school, park, daycare center, nursing home, etc. in certain circumstances. For more information please visit Pennsylvania’s State website.