Home Criminal Page 26

Criminal

Latin King Member Guilty for Racketeering Enterprise

Latin King Member Guilty for Racketeering Enterprise

 

On October 3, 2012, the Department of Justice announced that Wesley Anderson Williams, “King Bam,” pleaded guilty for “racketeering-related” charges.  He is a member of the North Carolina Almighty Latin King and Queen Nation (Latin Kings).  The announcement was made by Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S Attorney Ripley Rand.  
 
During his plea hearing, Wesley Williams admitted to being a member of the Latin Kings and committing home invasion, burglary, assault, arson, and check kiting.  Williams faces up to 20 years in prison and a maximum fine of $250,000 for his crimes.  
 
The guilty plea comes after Williams and 13 other defendants were charged in February of 2012.  A superseding indictment stated that the defendants engaged in violent racketeering that involved robberies, kidnappings, robbery, arson, extortion, and more—all in violation of the Hobbs Act.  
 
The following defendants were named in the superseding indictment.  They admitted to being members of the Latin Kings in North Carolina, and they have since pleaded guilty.  There sentencing is not yet scheduled:  
 
Luis Alberto Rosa, “King Speechless”
Marcelo Ysreal Perez, “King Lyrix”
Charles Lawrence Moore, “King Toasty”
Richard Lee Robinson, “King Focus”
Steaphan Acencio-Vasquez, “King Leo”
 
The following defendants were also named in the superseding indictment, and they have been identified as members of the Latin Kings in North Carolina.  Their trial is scheduled for October 15, 2012: 
 
Carolos Coleman, “King Spanky”
Jorge Peter Cornell, “King J”
Russell Lloyd Kilfoil, “King Peaceful”
Randolph Leif Kilfoil, “King Paul”
Jason Paul Yates, “King Squirrel”
Samuel Isaac Velasquez, “King Hype”
Irvin Vasquez, “King Dice”
Ernesto Wilson, “King Yayo”
 
The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Leshia M. Lee-Dixon under the Criminal Division’s Organized Crime and Gang Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert A. J. Lang for the Middle District of NC.  
 
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

TSA Officer Pleads Guilty to Smuggling Drugs

TSA Officer Pleads Guilty to Smuggling Drugs

 

On October 4, the US Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia announced that an ex-TSA officer, Timothy G. Gregory, pleaded guilty to “conspiring and attempting to smuggle cocaine through Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport.” The announcement was made by United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates.  
 
According to U.S. Attorney Yates and court documents, Gregory began abusing his powers in February of 2012.  He believed he was smuggling cocaine through security, but he was in a setup the whole time.  
 
An undercover officer gave Gregory give kilograms of fake cocaine on February 24, 2012 along with $5,000 cash.  Gregory then smuggled the fake cocaine through the checkpoint while he was wearing his TSA uniform.  He proceeded to deliver the fake drugs to another undercover agent at the terminal.  
 
Undercover agents provided Gregory with 10 pounds of fake cocaine on May 4, 2012 after he agreed to transport the drugs from Atlanta to Commerce, Georgia.  
 
Gregory was indicted on August 7, 2012 for three counts of drug trafficking.  He pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy and one count of possession with intent to distribute.  The FBI reports that Gregory faces a maximum penalty of life in prison and a fine up to $10,000,000.  
 
U.S. Attorney Sally Quillian Yates stated, “Mr. Gregory abused his position as a TSA officer to smuggle sham drugs through the world’s busiest airport for people he thought were narcotics traffickers.  The citizens of this district deserve better.  They rightfully deserve law enforcement officers who obey the laws that they are entrusted to enforce.  Mr. Gregory now faces a lengthy prison sentence.”  
 
Gregory’s sentencing will occur on December 18, 2012.  The case was investigated by the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General, and the United States Marshals Service.  
 
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Epic Sweep Results in Combined Sentence of 142 Years

Epic Sweep Results in Combined Sentence of 142 Years

 

On October 4, 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado announced that the Greeley Regional Anti-Gang Enforcement (RAGE) Task Force investigated, prosecuted, and sentenced 30 defendants for crimes involving drugs and guns.  The Task Force worked with the Greeley Police Department and the FBI during the investigation and prosecution.  The 30 criminals received a combined sentence of 142 years in federal prison.  
 
The prosecuted defendants and their sentences are listed below.  The defendants are from Greeley, Evans, Fort Collins, Loveland, and Eaton: 
 
Jeramy Antuna: 100 months
Anna Askvig: 15 months
Serena Benavidez: 18.5 months
Luis Dominguez: 60 months
Jose Luis Dominguez: 40 months
Rodolfo Dominguez: 132 months
Norma Enriquez: five years of probation
Randy Frias: 70 months
Domingo Garcia: 132 months
Chauvanna Gesick: 48 months
Roseann Gonzales: 8 months
Michael Gurule: 50 months
Desiree Marie Hernandez: 40 months
Freddie Kinzie-Garcia: 18 months
Elisia Llamas: 11 months
Aurelio Madrid: 100 months
Terry Margheim: sentence still pending
Jose Martinez: 30 months
Javier Medina: 87 months
Amanda Montes: three years of probation
Carlos Morales-Gonzales: 51 months
Elizabeth Navarro: 36 months
Anthony Rivera: 48 months
Todd Anthony Shelton: 150 months
Brian Thompson: 84 months
Onna Marie Trevino: 12 months
Anthony Trujillo: 78 months
Skyler Valencia: 40 months
Michelle Versemann: five years of probation
Ernest Ruseell Williams: 21 months
Alicia Baray-Deleon: 77 months
 
The defendants were charged with 139 counts of drug and gun crimes.  The drugs charges were for methamphetamine, and some of the charges were for distribution in a school zone and distributing where a child under 18 was present.  
 
U.S. Attorney John Walsh stated, “Our goal was to have a serious impact on criminals operating in Greeley.  Thirty defendants have been held accountable for their crimes, making Greeley a safer place to live.  Some of the defendants will be spending a significant amount of time behind bars for their drug and gun crimes.” 
 
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation
 

Bank Employee Admits Own Role in Bank Robbery

Bank Employee Admits Own Role in Bank Robbery

On October 4, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey announced that a Union County man admitted his role in robbing the bank where he worked, the TD Bank branch in Westfield, New Jersey.  The man’s name is Jelani Bustamonte, and he was arrested at his home on January 26, 2012.  

According to court documents, the first conspiracy involved a plan to rob bank tellers at the TD Bank in Westfield.  A second conspiracy involved a plan to rob the vault inside the same bank.  While planning the schemes, Bustamonte admitted to providing information about the layout of the bank, the bank’s security, and business operations occurring in the bank.  

The co-conspirator was Julio Ferrer, who pleaded guilty to robbing the TD Bank brand in Westfield.  He also admitted to robbing six other branches of the TD Bank throughout New Jersey from October 2011 to December 2011.  

The robbery at the TD Bank branch in Westfield occurred on September 11, 2011 at 2:21 p.m.  Ferrer enter the bank on 560 North Avenue East and proceeded to pass a deposit slip across the counter.  The teller was counting money at the time and returned the slip back to Ferrer after they failed to see the handwriting on the slip or the requested monetary amount.  Ferrer pushed the slip back across the counter and stated, “read it.”  The note stated, “I want all the money lose (sic) bills.”  The teller stepped back and Ferrer grabbed all of the money the teller was counting.  

Bustamonte told authorities he discussed how to rob the vault with Ferrer and several other people.  In return, he was going to receive $50,000.  He also told Ferrer to ask for “loose bills” instead of strapped money.

Bustamonte faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a fine up to $250,000.  He will be sentenced on February 5, 2013.  

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Another La Cosa Nostra Member Pleads Guilty

Another La Cosa Nostra Member Pleads Guilty

On October 5, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania announced that Louis Fazzini of Caldwell, New Jersey, pleaded guilty to an illegal gambling racketeering conspiracy and theft from an employee benefit plan.  Fazzini admitted to being a “made” member of the North Jersey crew of the La Cosa Nostra Family.  

As a member of the Family, he admitted that he operated an illegal sports bookmaking business.  Additionally, he admitted to devising a scheme in order to obtain health benefits by an operating a “no show” job that was controlled by the La Cosa Nostra.  A “now show” employee does not perform any work or productive service but still receive health benefits.  

Mr. Fazzini was one of 14 members of the Philadelphia La Cosa Nostra Family charged for crimes that involved conspiracy, extortion, loan sharking, illegal gambling, witness tampering, and theft a benefit plan.  The other members include Josepha Ligambi (the LCN Family boss), Josepha Massimino (the underboss), George Borgesi, Martin Angelina, Anthony Staino, Gaeton Lucibello, Damion Canalichio, Louis Barretta, Gary Battglini, Robert Verrecchia, Eric Esposito, Robert Ranieri, and Johseph Licata.  

The FBI reports that Lucibello was sentenced to 51 months in prison for racketeering conspiracy.  Mr. Angelina was sentenced to 57 months for racketeering conspiracy, and Barretta was sentenced to 33 months for racketeering conspiracy as well.  

Ligambi, Massimino, Borgesi, Staino, Canalichio, Battaglini, and Licata will receive their trial on October 9, 2012.  The rest of the men are still awaiting a trial date.  

The case was investigated by the FBI, the Criminal Investigation section of the IRS, the Pennsylvania State Police, the New Jersey State Police, the Philadelphia Police Department, the Inspector General Office of Labor Racketeering and Fraud Investigations under the U.S. Department of Labor, and the Employee Benefits Security Administration under the U.S. Department of Labor.  

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Middlesex Construction Company Paid Bribes and Kickbacks

Middlesex Construction Company Paid Bribes and Kickbacks

On October 4, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey announced that George Chrysanthopoulos of Little Silver, New Jersey was indicted for paying $350,000 in kickbacks to the New Jersey Department of Transportation and a private port terminal operator as well.  He is believed to have paid the kickbacks and bribes in order to receive construction contracts worth millions of dollars.  

According to the indictment, Chrysanthopoulos paid cash bribes to a private terminal operator in Port Elizabeth between the years of 2002 and 2008 in order to obtain construction contracts for his company, Tarheel Enterprises Inc.  Chrysanthopoulos agreed to pay the employee $20,000 for every $5 million that Tarheel made from the terminal operator.  

The same employee began working with law enforcement and he arranged meetings with Chrysanthopoulos between February 2011 and April 2011.  During the meetings, the employee and Chrysanthopoulos discussed the kickbacks and about $150 million in construction projects.  The following statement was recorded: “We could do the same thing like we did last time, George…like for every $5 million, I get 20 grand, boom…I’ll be happy, man.”  Chrysanthopoulos responded with the following statement: “I know what the parameters are…20 per give.”  

During the same meeting, Chrysanthopoulos gave names of bidders that would be invited to a 2011 project bid.  The FBI reports that Chrysanthopoulos paid about $48,000 in bribes to a NJDOT engineer in order to receive the engineer’s influence for $44 million contract that was eventually awarded to Tarheel.

Chrysanthopoulos faces a combined maximum sentence of 100 years in prison.  He also faces a $250,000 penalty for each count of mail and wire fraud.  Prosecutors are asking that Chrysanthopoulos forfeit $17 million of the proceeds.  

Assistant U.S. Attorney Harvey Bartle is prosecuting this case.  

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Drug Sting Leads to 44 Arrests in Puerto Rico

Drug Sting Leads to 44 Arrests in Puerto Rico

On October 5, 2012, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that 44 people were arrested in eastern Puerto for participation in a drug trafficking and money laundering organization.  The sting was conducted by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) under the ICE, the Puerto Rico Police Department, and the DEA.  

The indictment stated that Julio L. De Jesus-Gomez, Tania De Jesus-Gomez and Julia Gomez-Calcaño all tried to launder profits from drug trafficking into Luquillo Boat Glass Inc.  The ICE reports that the three defendants bought real estate and other assets by falsifying the source of money.  Purchases included $75,000 for land, $265,000 for property in Fajardo, and more.  

Tania De Jesus-Gomez and Julia Gomez-Calcaño were also indicted for tampering with a witness.  The ICE reports that the two defendants told a witness how to respond to law enforcement if the authorities asked questions about the purchases.

Angel Melendez, the Acting Special Agent in Charge for HIS San Juan, stated: “This case exemplifies that those involved in money laundering and the importation of narcotics and other contraband into and out of our country will be vigorously investigated and prosecuted.  HSI thanks out local, state and federal law enforcement partners for their significant cooperation in dismantling this narcotics and money laundering organization.”

All 44 defendants face a charge for conspiracy to commit drug trafficking.  Some of the members used private boats and boats from the Puerto Rico Maritime Transportation Authority to smuggle large amounts of cocaine and heroin throughout Puerto Rico.  23 of the defendants face additional charges for carrying firearms in connection with the drug trafficking.  

In total, the ICE reports that three leaders, one manager, six drug point owners, four enforcers, one supplier, ten runners, two drug processors, and twenty-four distributors have been charged.  

Source: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Hospital Employee Indicted for Hepatitis C Outbreak

Hospital Employee Indicted for Hepatitis C Outbreak


On November 29, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Hampshire announced that David M Kwiatkowski was indicted for infecting patients in New Hampshire and other states with Hepatitis C.  He is a former Exeter Hospital employee.  


According to the indictment, Kwiatkowski worked in Michigan as a health care worker and became a traveling health care technician in 2007.  He worked in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Arizona, Kansas, Georgia, and New Hampshire.  


Kwiatkowski knew he was infected with Hepatitis C since at least June 2010, and he started working for Exeter Hospital in April 2011.  


While working at Exeter Hospital, Kwiatkowski stole the controlled substance fentanyl—which has analgesic effects.  He knew when a patient was going to undergo a medical procedure, and he replaced the syringes of fentanyl with syringes of saline.  The syringes filled with saline were originally filled with fentanyl, but Kwiatkowski used the syringes himself before refilling them with saline—thus tainting the syringes before they were used on patients.  


Over 30 people became infected from Kwiatkowski’s Hepatitis C virus in New Hampshire and other states.  He was arrested on July 19, 2012.  


Hepatitis C is a blood-borne virus that is capable of causing serious liver damage.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) state that Hepatitis C kills more people in the United States every year than HIV.  


Kwiatkowski is charged with seven counts of tampering with a consumer product and seven counts of fraudulently obtaining controlled substances.  He faces up to 10 years in prison on each tampering charge and up to four years in prison on each count of obtaining controlled substances.  Each count is punishable with a $250,000 fine as well.  


The investigation is still ongoing.  Kwiatkowski remains innocent until proven guilty.  


Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation
 

Family watch dog

Family watch dog

WHAT IS FAMILY WATCH DOG?
 
 
As self described on their facebook site, "Family Watch Dog  is a tool…the public could use to keep their family informed and aware of different dangers in their area.  Our goal has always been to provide the most up-to date information to the public." The website, located at www.familywatchdog.us focuses primarily on sex offender awareness as well as keeping members of the community aware of food and drug recalls. 
 
 
WHAT INFORMATION CAN I RECEIVE ABOUT SEX OFFENDERS FROM THIS WEBSITE?
 
 
On the FAMILY WATCHDOG website one can find countless information on sex offenders living within the United States.  However, different States have different laws governing the dissemination of information and the only statistics available will often be those of level 2 and level 3 sex offenders.  These are individuals with a moderate to high risk of becoming a repeat offender.  By law, in most States, level 1 offenders, which are those who have a low risk of recidivism, may not be tracked by the public and the information regarding their sex offense is known only to law enforcement. 
 
 
FAMILY WATCHDOG compiles and maintains statistical data on the number of sex offenders living within a certain State.  The data includes the number of sex offender, the State population and the ratio of offenders per million residents in that State. 
 
 
FAMILY WATCHDOG also maintains an active and frequently updated map of registered sex offenders within The United States.  An individual looking for sex offenders in the community has two options.  They can either do a search based on an address plugged into the database or they can put a specific name in the database to find the location of a specific sex offender.  The data that FAMILY WATCHDOG uses is public information maintained by law enforcement agencies and the mapping is based off of current census data.
 
 
WHAT INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN THE MAP?
 
 
The mapping system provided by FAMILY WATCH DOG is very thorough.  Once a starting address is added the system will process a GPS type map of the area in question.  That map will have locations where registered sex offenders reside in color.  The color coding system designates different colors for the type of sexual offense depending on whether it was against a child, rape, sexual battery another offense.  It also has a color coding system to show whether the location is the offender's home or place of employment, etc.
 
 
 IS FAMILY WATCH DOG'S DATA RELIABLE?
 
 
For the most part FAMILY WATCH DOG is a highly respected citizen protection organization but it does have its limitations.  All data compiled and disseminated by FAMILY WATCH DOG is gathered from law enforcement and the census bureau.  It is the responsibility of a registered sex offender to register his/her address with law enforcement.  If he/she does not do so then FAMILY WATCH DOG has no way of knowing where the sex offender is residing.  Another problem is that census data is not always accurate.  Especially with the mapping system, if an address or location registered with the census bureau is incorrect it will be reflected in the mapping.

PA MEGAN’S LAW

PA MEGAN'S LAW

 Understanding Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law: Protecting Communities from Sexual Offenders

Introduction

Megan’s Law is a critical piece of legislation that plays a pivotal role in safeguarding communities across the United States from sexual offenders. Each state in the U.S. has its own version of Megan’s Law, aimed at monitoring and regulating the activities of individuals convicted of sexual offenses. In this article, we will delve into the specifics of Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law, exploring its history, objectives, implementation, and the resources available for public awareness and safety. To ensure accuracy and credibility, we will primarily rely on information from government resources.

  1. The Origins and Purpose of Megan’s Law

Megan’s Law is named after Megan Kanka, a young girl from New Jersey who was tragically sexually assaulted and murdered by a neighbor who was a previously convicted sex offender. Her death in 1994 was a wake-up call that highlighted the need for greater community awareness and protection against sexual predators.

Pennsylvania, like many other states, responded to this tragic event by enacting its own version of Megan’s Law. The primary objectives of Megan’s Law in Pennsylvania include:

  1. Community Notification: To inform residents about the presence of sex offenders in their neighborhoods. This notification empowers residents to take precautions and make informed decisions to protect their families.
  1. Law Enforcement Tool: To provide law enforcement agencies with tools to effectively monitor and manage registered sex offenders, thereby reducing the risk of re-offending.
  1. Deterrence: To act as a deterrent by making potential sex offenders aware of the consequences they will face, including public registration and notification, if they commit sexual offenses.
  1. Implementation of Megan’s Law in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law is a comprehensive and multifaceted system designed to track, register, and manage individuals convicted of sexual offenses. The key components of its implementation include:

  1. Registration: Under Pennsylvania law, individuals convicted of certain sexual offenses must register as sex offenders. This registration involves providing detailed personal information, including their name, address, photograph, fingerprints, and other relevant details.
  1. Tier System: Megan’s Law in Pennsylvania employs a tier system to categorize sex offenders based on the severity of their offenses and the likelihood of re-offending. There are three tiers, with Tier 3 being the highest risk.
  1. Community Notification: Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law emphasizes community notification. Law enforcement agencies are responsible for notifying the public about the presence of registered sex offenders, especially those classified under Tier 2 and Tier 3. The public is informed about the offender’s name, address, photograph, and the nature of their offenses.
  1. Website Access: The Pennsylvania State Police maintain a publicly accessible website that allows residents to search for registered sex offenders in their communities. This online tool plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and empowering individuals to stay informed.
  1. Lifetime Registration: In some cases, individuals convicted of certain sexual offenses are required to register as sex offenders for life, underscoring the state’s commitment to long-term monitoring.

III. Megan’s Law and Constitutional Considerations

While Megan’s Law has been instrumental in enhancing community safety, it has also raised constitutional questions and concerns, particularly regarding privacy and due process rights. Some individuals argue that the public shaming associated with community notification may infringe upon the constitutional rights of sex offenders who have completed their sentences and paid their debt to society.

The U.S. Supreme Court addressed these concerns in the case of Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe (2003). In this case, the Court upheld the constitutionality of Megan’s Law-type statutes but also emphasized the importance of individualized risk assessment and periodic review.

Pennsylvania has made efforts to address these constitutional concerns by implementing a tiered system that takes into account the risk level posed by individual offenders. This approach is designed to balance public safety with the rights of the convicted.

  1. Resources for Public Awareness and Safety

Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law places a strong emphasis on public awareness and community safety. To facilitate this, the state provides various resources to help residents stay informed and take proactive measures:

  1. Pennsylvania State Police Website: The official Pennsylvania State Police website maintains an easily accessible database of registered sex offenders. Residents can search for offenders by name, location, or zip code to obtain relevant information about their presence in their communities.
  1. Community Meetings: Law enforcement agencies often conduct community meetings to educate residents about Megan’s Law and the presence of sex offenders in their neighborhoods. These meetings provide an opportunity for residents to ask questions and voice their concerns.
  1. Online Safety Resources: The Pennsylvania State Police website also offers educational resources on internet safety, particularly for parents and guardians. Given the increasing use of technology for sexual offenses, these resources are crucial in protecting children and adolescents.
  1. Crime Watch Programs: Many communities in Pennsylvania have active crime watch programs that work in collaboration with law enforcement agencies. These programs are essential for fostering community vigilance and communication regarding potential threats.
  1. Local Law Enforcement: Residents can contact their local law enforcement agencies for information and assistance related to Megan’s Law. Law enforcement officers are typically well-versed in the law’s provisions and can provide guidance on safety measures.
  1. The Evolving Landscape of Megan’s Law

Megan’s Law in Pennsylvania, like in many other states, has evolved over the years to address emerging challenges and adapt to changes in technology. Some notable developments and considerations include:

  1. Online Presence: With the proliferation of social media and online platforms, there is a growing debate about whether registered sex offenders should be required to disclose their online presence and email addresses. Pennsylvania, like other states, has had to grapple with this issue.
  1. Challenges of Monitoring: The ongoing challenge for law enforcement agencies is to effectively monitor and manage a growing number of registered sex offenders. This task requires dedicated resources and technological support.
  1. Continued Legal Challenges: Legal challenges to Megan’s Law are not uncommon, with ongoing debates about the balance between public safety and the constitutional rights of offenders. The law is likely to continue evolving as courts address these challenges.
  1. Community Engagement: Community engagement remains a critical aspect of Megan’s Law’s success. Public awareness, education, and cooperation are essential in creating safer communities.

Conclusion

Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law is a vital tool in the ongoing efforts to protect communities from sexual offenders. Its emphasis on community notification, tiered risk assessment, and public resources for awareness and safety make it a comprehensive and dynamic system. While it is not without its constitutional and logistical challenges, Pennsylvania continues to refine and adapt its Megan’s Law to ensure the safety and well-being of its residents. As the landscape of sexual offender management evolves, Megan’s Law in Pennsylvania will likely continue to play a central role in community safety.


WHAT IS PENNSYLVANIA’S POLICY ON MEGAN’S LAW?

PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW is essentially an adjunct to the NATIONAL MEGAN’S LAW that was put into effect by then President Bill Clinton in 1996.  In 1995 then Governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Ridge, introduced legislation to protect the citizens of Pennsylvania from the threat of registered sex offenders living within the State.  The bill became active in April of 1996.  PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGANS LAW, which was signed as Act 24 of 1995 imposes a number of criteria upon registered sex offenders.

WHAT DOES PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW REQUIRE OF SEX OFFENDERS?

The PENNSYLVANIA MEGAN’S LAW allows sentencing courts to impose life sentences on those sexually violent offenders who are deemed to be “predators.”  PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW also requires sex offenders and sexually violent predators to register with the Pennsylvania State Police.  It also stipulated that communities be notified when and where a sexually violent predator moves into an area.

WHAT ARE THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS?

The State of Pennsylvania requires sex offenders, as per PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW to register with the State Police Department for a period of time upon their release from prison.  The State breaks up the requirements to 10 years of registration to Life registration.

The requirement of 10 year registration is reserved for crimes including: kidnapping of a minor, luring a child into a motor vehicle, incest where the victim is over 12 years of age, obscene and other sexual materials where the victim is a minor, sexual abuse of children, unlawful contact with a minor, and a list of others that may be found at www.pameganslaw.state.pa.us.

The requirement of life registration is reserved for crimes including:  offenders with two or more convictions of any of the offenses set forth in the 10 year registration requirement, rape, sexual assault, incest where the victim is under 12 years of age and offenders considered sexually violent predators.  For a full list of the offenses that require lifetime registration see www.pameganslaw.state.pa.us.

WHAT INFORMATION DOES PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW PROVIDE CITIZENS?

Pennsylvania seems to take a stricter stance on the amount of information that a sex offender living within the State must provide.  This data include:

·         Name and all known aliases;

·         Year of birth;

·         Street address, city, municipality, county, zip code and all residences, and where applicable the name of the prison or other place of confinement;

·         Name, address and all other information associated with an offenders school or employment;

·         Physical description of the offender, including photos;

·         Identification marks;

·         License plate numbers and descriptions of vehicles;

·         Current registry compliance status;

·         Whether the victim of the offense was a minor;

·         A description of the offense;

·         Date of conviction;

·         A map of where the offender lived and attends school, if applicable.

DOES PENNSYLVANIA RESTRICT THE LOCATION WHERE A SEX OFFENDER MAY LIVE?

PENNSYLVANIA’S MEGAN’S LAW does not restrict where a registered sex offender may reside.  The exception to the rule is that a registered sex offender may not live near a school, park, daycare center, nursing home, etc. in certain circumstances.  For more information please visit Pennsylvania’s State website.

Attorneys, Get Listed

X