Home Criminal Page 26

Criminal

Middlesex Construction Company Paid Bribes and Kickbacks

Middlesex Construction Company Paid Bribes and Kickbacks

On October 4, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey announced that George Chrysanthopoulos of Little Silver, New Jersey was indicted for paying $350,000 in kickbacks to the New Jersey Department of Transportation and a private port terminal operator as well.  He is believed to have paid the kickbacks and bribes in order to receive construction contracts worth millions of dollars.  

According to the indictment, Chrysanthopoulos paid cash bribes to a private terminal operator in Port Elizabeth between the years of 2002 and 2008 in order to obtain construction contracts for his company, Tarheel Enterprises Inc.  Chrysanthopoulos agreed to pay the employee $20,000 for every $5 million that Tarheel made from the terminal operator.  

The same employee began working with law enforcement and he arranged meetings with Chrysanthopoulos between February 2011 and April 2011.  During the meetings, the employee and Chrysanthopoulos discussed the kickbacks and about $150 million in construction projects.  The following statement was recorded: “We could do the same thing like we did last time, George…like for every $5 million, I get 20 grand, boom…I’ll be happy, man.”  Chrysanthopoulos responded with the following statement: “I know what the parameters are…20 per give.”  

During the same meeting, Chrysanthopoulos gave names of bidders that would be invited to a 2011 project bid.  The FBI reports that Chrysanthopoulos paid about $48,000 in bribes to a NJDOT engineer in order to receive the engineer’s influence for $44 million contract that was eventually awarded to Tarheel.

Chrysanthopoulos faces a combined maximum sentence of 100 years in prison.  He also faces a $250,000 penalty for each count of mail and wire fraud.  Prosecutors are asking that Chrysanthopoulos forfeit $17 million of the proceeds.  

Assistant U.S. Attorney Harvey Bartle is prosecuting this case.  

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Drug Sting Leads to 44 Arrests in Puerto Rico

Drug Sting Leads to 44 Arrests in Puerto Rico

On October 5, 2012, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that 44 people were arrested in eastern Puerto for participation in a drug trafficking and money laundering organization.  The sting was conducted by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) under the ICE, the Puerto Rico Police Department, and the DEA.  

The indictment stated that Julio L. De Jesus-Gomez, Tania De Jesus-Gomez and Julia Gomez-Calcaño all tried to launder profits from drug trafficking into Luquillo Boat Glass Inc.  The ICE reports that the three defendants bought real estate and other assets by falsifying the source of money.  Purchases included $75,000 for land, $265,000 for property in Fajardo, and more.  

Tania De Jesus-Gomez and Julia Gomez-Calcaño were also indicted for tampering with a witness.  The ICE reports that the two defendants told a witness how to respond to law enforcement if the authorities asked questions about the purchases.

Angel Melendez, the Acting Special Agent in Charge for HIS San Juan, stated: “This case exemplifies that those involved in money laundering and the importation of narcotics and other contraband into and out of our country will be vigorously investigated and prosecuted.  HSI thanks out local, state and federal law enforcement partners for their significant cooperation in dismantling this narcotics and money laundering organization.”

All 44 defendants face a charge for conspiracy to commit drug trafficking.  Some of the members used private boats and boats from the Puerto Rico Maritime Transportation Authority to smuggle large amounts of cocaine and heroin throughout Puerto Rico.  23 of the defendants face additional charges for carrying firearms in connection with the drug trafficking.  

In total, the ICE reports that three leaders, one manager, six drug point owners, four enforcers, one supplier, ten runners, two drug processors, and twenty-four distributors have been charged.  

Source: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

NYC Supervisory Officials Plead Guilty to Bribery

NYC Supervisory Officials Plead Guilty to Bribery

On October 2, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York announced that two former supervisors part of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) pleaded guilty to bribery charges in a scheme to bribe highly ranked officials and receive much desired construction contracts.  Luis Adorno, who was the inspections supervisor for the HPD, and Michael Provenzano, who was the former HPD director of construction services, pleaded guilty.  

 
The FBI reports that HPD is the biggest municipal developer of affordable housing in the country.  According to complaint documents, Provenzano received bribes numerous $10,000 bribes over a span of several years in return for making inspection reports to the hired contractor.  The FBI also reports that Adorno received a $100,000 bribe from a general contractor in return of awarding the contractor with construction contracts.  
 
FBI Assistant Director in Charge, Mary Galligan, stated: “As alleged, these defendants flouted their responsibilities as city employees to profit personally.  When public employees favor bribe-payers, inevitably the city and the public stand to lose.  The city gets substandard goods or services or pays above market rates for them or the public is otherwise at risk.” 
 
Both Provenzano and Adorno face a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.  The investigation was handled by the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation in New York, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the New York City Police Department, and the FBI.  United States Attorney Lynch thanks the organizations for their assistance.  
 
DOI Commissioner Gill Hearn commented, “These two ex-employees lost their city jobs and are now felons who have admitted taking bribes.  Their conduct shows the peril and foolishness of corruption.  We will continue to work with our partners in law enforcement and our colleagues in city government to expose, stop, and prevent corruption and protect the city and its taxpayers from this kind of abuse.” 
 
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

11 Russian Procurement Network Members Charged and Arrested

11 Russian Procurement Network Members Charged and Arrested

 

On October 3, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York announced that a Russian agent and 10 other members of a procurement network for the Russian Military and Intelligence were arrested while operating in the United States.  The individuals were charged for their part in exporting high-tech microelectronics form the U.S. to Russia.  The agent, Alexander Fishenko, was also charged for operating an unregistered agent for Russia while in the United States. 
 
The microelectronics are strictly controlled by the U.S government because they can be used in military systems like radar, surveillance systems, guidance systems for weapons, and detonation triggers.  
 
According to the indictment, Fishenko founded a company called Arc Electronics Inc. in Houston after he immigrated to the U.S. in 1994.  Between 2002 and before being arrested, Fishenko is believed to have shipped about $50,000,000 worth of microelectronics and other types of technology to Russia.  Fishenko is also part owner of Apex System LLC in Moscow, which is a supplier of military equipment to the Russian government.  
 
In order to export the technologies, the defendants reported false information concerning the purchase of the technology, hid the fact that they were exporters, and falsely identified the technologies in record submitted to the Department of Commerce.  The FBI reports that the defendants used sophisticated techniques to hide their procurement activities with the Russian military.  
 
The Department of Commerce also compiled a list of 165 foreign companies and persons that receives, transported, or allowed for the exportation of the technologies.  The defendants are Arc Electronics Inc., Apex System LLC, Alexander Fishenko, Shavat Abdullaev, Lyudmila Bagdikian, Anastasia Diatlova, Viktoria Klebanova, Sergey Klinov, Alexander Posobilov, Yuri Savin, Dmitriy Shegurov, Sevinj Taghiyeva, Svetalina Zagon.  
 
FBI Special Agent in Charge, Stephen L. Morris, announced, “In this day and time, the ability of foreign countries to illegally acquire sensitive and sophisticated U.S. technology poses a significant threat to both the economic and national security of our nation.”  
 
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Man Deported for Murder, Extortion, and Organized Crime

Man Deported for Murder, Extortion, and Organized Crime

 

On October 2, 2012, the Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) under the Immigration and Custom’s Enforcement announced that a Salvadorian man was deported to his home country because he is wanted for murder, organized crime, and extortion.  The man’s name is Walter Fernando Alfaro-Pineda.
 
Officers under the Criminal Alien Program met with Alfaro-Pineda at Lee County Jail in Texas after officers retrieved an Interpol fugitive warrant after his arrest on June 18.  He was then released into custody of the ERO and sentenced by an immigration judge on September 5, 2012.
 
The Salvadorian fugitive was removed by the country on a charter flight by the ERO’s Air Operations Unit (IAO).  The ERO reports that 500 foreign fugitives have been removed from the United States since October 1, 2009.  The fugitives have been accused of serious crimes like rape, kidnapping, major drug offences, murder, and more.
 
David W. Jennings, a field office director at ERO Houston, stated, “This removal is the positive result of ICE’s thorough screening of jails and prisons throughout the nation.  This case is representative of the hard work and service by ERO and our law enforcement partners to ensure public safety.”
 
The Criminal Alien Program under the ERO attempts to identify fugitive aliens that are located in jails and prisons in the United States.  Targeting is mainly accomplished by conducting interviews and reviewing an inmate’s biographical information within their record.  Some of the criminal may stay in U.S. jails to finish their sentencing in this country before being deported and tried in their own country.
 
The ERO decides to hold the criminals or immediately deport the criminals based on their level of risk and the severity of the crimes in the home country.
 
Source: U.S. Immigration and Custom’s Enforcement

FDA Cracks Down on Illegal Internet Pharmacies

FDA Cracks Down on Illegal Internet Pharmacies

 

On October 4, 2012, the Food and Drug Administration announced that it took action against over 4,100 internet pharmacies that are illegally selling dangerous or unapproved drugs this week.  The FDA partnered with numerous law enforcement and international regulatory agencies.  
 
The FDA reports that this year’s effort to control online sales and distribution is called Operation Pangea V.  The initiative occurred between September 25 and October 2, and over 18,000 illegal pharmaceutical websites were shutdown and more than $10.5 million was seized worldwide.  
 
The FDA identified a large number of illegal medicines sold by the pharmaceutical websites: 
 
Domperidone: the medicine was removed from the United States in 1998 because it can cause an irregular heartbeat, sudden stop of the heart, and even sudden death.  The medicine is used for increasing milk production in nursing mothers. 
Isotretinoin (Accutane): the medicine is strictly controlled and used to treat serious nodular acne.  The medicine has serious side effects like birth defects, so the medicine has restrictions in the U.S. 
Tamiflu: this drug is used to treat the flu and is often sold in its generic form online.  There is no FDA-approved generic version of the drug, and the FDA reports that many generic version contain the wrong active ingredients.  
Viagra: the drug is used to treat erectile dysfunction and is strictly regulated because it dangerous when used by people with certain heart conditions.  
 
The FDA reports that it also sent warning letter to over 4,100 websites.  According to FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D., “Consumers in the United States and around the world face a real threat from Internet pharmacies that illegally sell potentially substandard, counterfeit, adulterated, or otherwise unsafe medicines.  The week’s efforts show that strong international enforcement efforts are required to combat this global public health concern.” 
 
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Man Receives 41 Months for Threatening Pro-Life Supporters

Man Receives 41 Months for Threatening Pro-Life Supporters

 

On October 3, 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York stated that Theodore Shulman, a pro-choice supporter, was sentenced in a Manhattan federal court to 41 months in prison after he threatened to kill to pro-life supporters.  The announcement was made by Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.  
 
The FBI reports that Mr. Shulman pled guilty in May of 2012 to “one count of transmitting a threat to injure another person.”  The guilty plea was presented before United States District Judge Paul A. Crotty, who also issued the sentence on October 3.  
 
According to court documents, Mr. Shulman made a threat to two pro-life advocates on January 14, 2010.  Mr. Shulman made the threat by post a message on a blog called “SecondHandSmoke” on the website, FirstThings.com.  The FBI reports that the message read, “If Roeder is acquitted, someone will respond by killing [Victim-1] of [the university] and [Victim-2] of Priests of Life.”  
 
The Roeder comment applied to Scott Roeder.  He was convicted in 2010 for murdering Dr. George Tiller, who provided abortions.  The FBI reports the threat was serious after they found cyanide, castor beans, and rosary peas in Shulman’s possession during his arrest on February of 2011.  
 
U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated, “The vibrant exchange of ideas that is a hallmark of our society does not include threats.  As Theodore Shulman’s sentence makes clear, advocating one’s point of view through threats of violence is illegal conduct that will be punished.” 
 
Shulman is also sentenced to three years of supervised release.  The FBI was responsible for the investigation.  The prosecution was handled by Assistant United States Attorneys Kan M. Nawaday and David Miller who were part of the Office’s General Crimes Unit.  
 
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Sex Offender List

Sex Offender List

 

WHAT IS A SEX OFFENDER LIST?

A SEX OFFENDER LIST, also more commonly known as the Sex Offender Registry, is a list of all sex offenders in a community.  It is required in all States in the Union and is also in existence in Canada and The United Kingdom.  In many States in the Union information about registered sex offenders in the community are made public and can be found in newspapers, public notices and through internet websites.  Other States, however, do not permit public knowledge and complete SEX OFFENDERR LISTS are only available to law enforcement.

WHO HAS TO REGISTER?

The laws differ from State to State but generally someone who must register and be put on a SEX OFFENDER LIST is an individual that has been convicted of sex offense.  This includes sexual assault, rape, molestation, kidnapping a child; and the production, proliferation or viewing of child pornography.  There are lists of other sex offenses that will subject someone to being placed on a sex offender list.  Check with the State Division of Criminal Justice in that specific jurisdiction to find out who must register.

THREE LEVELS OF SEX OFFENDER STATUS

Generally there are three (3) levels of sex offender status, only two (2) of which are available to the public.  These levels are based on the risk of being a repeat offender.  These range from low risk (level 1) to high risk (level 3).  Level 1 sex offenders must register as a sex offender for 20 consecutive years.  If a sex offender is designated level 2 or 3 then they must register for life.

WHAT INFORMATION IS PROVIDED?

As with all laws delegated to the States, the requirements do vary.  At a minimum convicted sex offenders are required to include their name, address, school or place of employment and are often restricted from residing within a certain distance of a school, nursing home, etc. 

HOW CAN I FIND REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS IN MY COMMUNITY?

The federal government maintains a National Sex Offender Public Website which enables all U.S. citizens to access and discover registered sex offenders in their community.  In addition to this many states and local communities maintain their own websites that divulge this information including names, addresses, photographs, descriptions, etc.  The public policy is to insure that families and children are protected from registered sex offenders.

This policy is not without its critics.  Many people assert that this form of registry only helps families of victims and those outraged by sexual crimes to plot revenge against sex offenders.  For detailed information about where sex offenders may be located in your area you may visit the FBI's Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website (NSOPW) at www.nsopw.gov. 

Every Person Deserves a Zealous Advocate, Says Texas Criminal Defense Attorney

Every Person Deserves a Zealous Advocate, Says Texas Criminal Defense Attorney

San Antonio, TX—For Demetrio Duarte, defending people accused of crimes has been a career for over 25 years.  Duarte told laws.com in a recent interview that his upbringing made him realize how badly criminal defenders are needed.

“Being a young Hispanic male in the 1960s and 1970s in South Texas, I witnessed a lack of legal representation in my community,” he recalls.  “This led to a growing desire to defend people of all communities, but in particular, those in my community who were in severe need of help.”

(More on News at LAWS.com, Contact Alberto for interviews “support@laws.com”)

After going to the University of Texas Law School in Austin, Duarte took a job at the Bexar County District Attorney's Office, which he says “gave me the mentorship I needed” to get started in criminal law.  He later struck out on his own, starting a solo practice.

Today, Demetrio Duarte, Jr. & Associates, P.C. represents clients in a wide variety of legal situations.  Trying to decide which cases to take is a matter of careful consideration for Duarte.  “I would say that 95 percent of the people who walk into a criminal defense attorney's office are guilty of something, and they all need help because of a mistake they have made,” he says.  “Helping people who want to be helped and who admit that they have issues are always easier to assist than those who demand a guarantee of a favorable result from me.”

This last type of client is often worth avoiding, according to Duarte.  “Typically, those who seek a guarantee of a favorable result and are demanding have to do with organized crime, and those are cases I try to avoid.  I prefer to work with clients who have realistic expectations.”

Doing criminal defense work in 2013 may be harder than ever, according to Duarte.  “Over the years, I have seen such an erosion of Miranda rights and civil liberties in favor of the government and the police, and less and less in favor of the protection of the individual.  Standing up for individuals' rights has become extremely difficult for defense attorneys today because of this.”

New types of evidence can also lead to more convictions, Duarte says.  “It's harder to try cases in court nowadays, because of the amount of technology that we have today that we didn't before.  Now, we have DNA, videotapes, cell phone cameras, and street corners with video surveillance—this makes it more difficult to try cases.”  As a result, plea bargains are up and trial numbers are down versus just a decade ago.

Duarte believes that new attorneys, regardless of where they went to law school or what practice area they want to specialize in, should find a mentor.  “There are many attorneys who are willing to help a student out, if only they ask.  There is no need to start trying cases without the assistance of an attorney with experience who can guide you in the beginning of your career,” he says, noting that he mentors several young attorneys today.  “Leave your pride aside and ask for help when you first start practicing law.”

Demetrio Duarte, Jr. & Associates, P.C. operates as a team. Each player on the team focuses on moving all issues forward toward a goal in. The attorneys in the law firm are committed to treating client matters as if they were their own. To learn more about his practice click here.

Conduct Disorder

Conduct Disorder

Conduct Disorder

Conduct disorder refers to a mental condition that describes individuals that display a callous lack of empathy for others and typically display aggressive and antisocial behavior without regards to the pain inflicted on others.  Conduct disorder is often hard to diagnose but typically affect young persons that display anti-social behavior such as vandalism and cruel behavior.
How is conduct disorder identified?
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association maintains a classification system to diagnose potential conduct disorder.  The criteria are categorized in the following manner:
Aggression to people and animals (fighting, bullying, use of weapons, cruelty)
Destruction of property (setting fires to destroy property)
Deceitfulness or theft (stealing, conning and shoplifting)
Serious violations of rules (truancy and violations of curfew)
Typically, any combination of these three criteria within 12 months diagnoses some form of conduct disorder, ranging from mild to moderate or severe.  Clearly, the mild categorization, despite some causes for concern, does not typically label the child a danger to others.  Persisting symptoms of conduct disorder however, may cause concern, especially if these symptoms do not dissipate with age.
How does environment affect conduct disorder?
Conduct disorder typically affects only a small percentage of children, but this is more common for children that have poor parenting or live in a violent area.  This may change the behavior of the child toward delinquency and antisocial behavior due to a lack of guidance or factors that encourage such behavior, such as peers with conduct disorder.
What are the long term consequences of conduct disorder?
Failure to treat or mistreating conduct disorder can lead to further alienation and escalation of the child’s antisocial behavior.  With an improper or confrontational approach, the conduct disorder can be exacerbated or the child may lash out in other ways, potentially even becoming self-destructive.  This behavior can also lead to mental health issues in adulthood, which will eventually lead to serious a repeating cycle of destructive behavior.
How can conduct disorder be managed?
Conduct disorder is usually best managed by the family with the aid of mental health professionals.  This is because behavior associated with conduct disorder is frequent and rarely understood by others.  The parents are typically the best equipped to work with their child to ensure their long term emotional health and development.  The mental health professional will offer advice to help the child cope with violent or destructive urges and try to establish protocol to deal with further incidents of conduct disorder.

Attorneys, Get Listed

X