Home Criminal Page 20

Criminal

Raouf Hannachi

Raouf Hannachi

 


Raouf Hannachi

Raouf Hannachi is a former Canadian citizen whose current whereabouts are unknown. Raouf Hannachi came to the attention of Canadian authorities as a potential terrorist who was monitored prior to the events of September 11, 2001 as an apparent recruiter for jihadist activities.

Raouf Hannachi was born in Tunisia who moved to Montreal. In 1986, he was made a citizen of Canada and became an active part of the jihadist Islamic community there. Raouf Hannachi commonly recruited young men for the jihadist cause by telling them about how he had trained in a camp run by terrorist Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan at an unspecified date. Raouf Hannachi described training that included instruction in the use of AK-47 firearms, as well as instruction in urban warfare and proper use of explosives. Raouf Hannachi would urge these young men to join the jihadist cause.

One of the young men whom Raouf Hannachi spoke with and influenced was Ahmed Ressam, who later attempted to detonate an explosive in the Los Angeles International Airport. Raouf Hannachi was named as a terrorist recruiter by jihadist Abu Zubaydah after he was captured and interrogated by American Authorities.

Following the events of September 11, 2001, Raouf Hannachi returned to Tunisia in October. Allegedly, he left Canada because he felt harassed by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. Upon his arrival, he entered the custody of Tunisian authorities, who questioned him about his role in jihadist activities. Afterwards, he was released from their custody. The current whereabouts of Raouf Hannachi are unknown. Canadian investigations of his activities concluded that he was probably responsible for the recruitment of some of the dozen or so Canadian citizens who trained in Afghanistan terrorist camps.

 

Prominent Defense Attorney Talks Crime and Punishment

Prominent Defense Attorney Talks Crime and Punishment

NEW YORK, NY—A commitment to civil rights for all people started early for Robert J. Feldman, an attorney who has been representing criminal defendants for over 30 years.  According to Feldman, his “wild adolescence during the 1960s caused me to always be suspicious of government and to cherish freedom and civil rights.”

(More on News at LAWS.com, Contact Alberto for interviews “support@laws.com”)

A member of the Brooklyn Law School class of 1980, Feldman says that while he was earning his J.D., “it became crystal clear that the only areas of law that inspired me were criminal and constitutional law.  Protecting the rights of the accused—and especially trying their cases—is the greatest gig imaginable.”

While defending cases for clients accused of everything from violations to felonies, Feldman says that he has become skeptical about the need to incarcerate many of the people who have been accused of crimes in the United States.  “So many individuals are either unjustly accused or are unfairly prosecuted for minor transgressions that certainly do not merit criminal conviction or incarceration,” he says.  “In my view, humans should not be caged unless they are a danger to others.”

In addition to victimless crimes like drug possession, Feldman also says incarceration should be reconsidered in public lewdness cases.  “Public lewdness nowadays is code for two adults privately (or with like-minded people watching) having some fun in the sand dunes or in a remote park or lover's lane setting.”  This kind of consensual sexual activity, he says, doesn't need to be punished with jail time by the courts or focused on by law enforcement for undercover sting operations.

Recently, Feldman defended one of these lewdness cases in federal court.  His client, a retired police detective with the NYPD, was propositioned for sex in an isolated beach area by an undercover officer.  A judge ruled that the detective was not guilty of lewdness because there was no way for other people to see his lower body or genitals.  Feldman also claimed during the case that the undercover police officer had lied about the actions that took place between himself and the retired detective.

In addition to defending clients accused of criminal acts, Feldman also recently gained national attention for representing Lt. Dan Choi, a gay Army lieutenant who was discharged from military service because of his sexual orientation while the controversial “Don't Ask, Don't Tell” policy was active.  Choi's protests of the DADT policy led to selective prosecution during protest actions.

Choi's case eventually led to federal judge Virginia Phillips ordering the end of the “Don't Ask, Don't Tell” policy, which led in turn to its legislative repeal by Congress and President Barack Obama.  “At the end of the day,” Feldman says of Choi, “he complimented us on our superb representation.”

That representation leads more clients to come to Feldman's door than he can help.  “Hundreds of people contact me every year because they want me to represent them,” he says.  “I only take clients who I believe I can help.  If I can't envision success, I will not represent them.  I agree to represent about 50 to 60 percent of the people who contact me.”
To learn more about Robert J. Feldman please visit his official website www.newyork-criminal-defense.com

Student Planned to Use Weapon of Mass Destruction

Student Planned to Use Weapon of Mass Destruction


On November 13, 2012, the Department of Justice announced that Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari was sentenced to life in prison for attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction.  The Saudi Arabian national was admitted into the United States in 2008 on a student visa for South Plains College near Lubbock.  


On February 1, 2011, a chemical supplier told the FBI that they received a suspicious request for concentrated phenol by Aldawsari.  Phenol is used to make explosive trinitrophenol (T.N.P.) or picric acid.  The chemicals needed to make T.N.P. or picric acid include sulfuric and nitric acids.  Aldawsari told the company he wanted the chemicals sent to a freight company for “off-campus, personal research.”  He eventually cancelled the order, but he obtained concentrated nitric and sulfuric acid by December 2010.  


A journal found at Aldawsari’s resident showed that he was planning a terrorist attack on the United States for years.  The journal stated that a scholarship greatly helped him come to the United States, and the journal specifically stated, “And now, after mastering the English language, learning how to build explosives, and continuous planning to target the infidel Americans, it is time for jihad.”


The investigation proved that Aldawsari sent emails to himself that contained instructions on how to make powerful explosives, how to turn a cell phone into a detonator, and how to make a bomb out of a vehicle.  He also bought a Hazmat suit, multiple beakers and flasks, a battery tester, a soldering iron kit, and more.  


U.S. Attorney Sarah R. Saldaña stated, “This case, in which private citizens paid attention to details and notified authorities of their suspicions, serves as a reminder to all private citizens that we must always be observant and vigilant, as there are some who intend to cause great harm.  Khalid Aldawsari, acting as a lone wolf, may well have gone undetected were it not for the keen observations of private citizens.”


Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

$70,000 Reward for “AK-47 Bandit” Information

$70,000 Reward for “AK-47 Bandit” Information


On November 8, 2012, the FBI announced that a male adult suspect who robbed an Idaho credit under the day before appears to be the “AK-47 Bandit.”  The suspect has robbed banks in parts of California and Washington, and it appears his crime spree has spread into Idaho.  


The recent robbery occurred at the East Idaho Credit Union in Rexburg on November 7.  The suspect was wearing a mask and yielding an assault rifle as he ordered employees and customers into the bank’s vault.  Nobody was injured during the robbery, but the suspect made off with a large amount of cash.  


The suspect is believed to have robbed banks on February 29, March 12, and July 6, 2012 as well.  The first robbery on February 29 occurred at the California Bank & Trust in Chino, California.  A police officer was shot and seriously injured by the assault rifle during the robbery.  


The second robbery occurred on March 12 at the Bank of the West on the 1000 block of Helen Power Drive in Vacaville, California.  The third robbery occurred at the Chase Bank on Mt. Si Boulevard in North Bend, Washington.  The suspect may have been involved with a robbery at the Tri Counties Bank on the 1700 block of Challenge Way located in Sacramento, California on March 9th as well.


The FBI is offering up to $50,000 for information that leads to the suspect’s arrest, and the East Idaho Credit Union is offering up to $20,000 for information that leads to the arrest of the suspect who robbed the bank on November 7.  You can contact the FBI Salt Lake City Division at (801) 579-1400.  


The suspect is considered armed and extremely dangerous.  


Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Texas Inmate Pleaded Guilty to Hate Crime

Texas Inmate Pleaded Guilty to Hate Crime


On November 8, 2012, the Department of Justice reported that John Hall—a current inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Seagoville, Texas—pleaded guilty to a hate crime against an inmate he thought was gay.  Hall was in direct violation of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.  The crime occurred on December 20, 2011.  


According to court documents, Hall targeted the other inmate because of the inmate’s sexual orientation.  He admitted to kicking and punching the victim while yelling gay slurs, and he also admitted to using a dangerous weapon during the crime.  The victim sustained serious bodily injury, chipped teeth, and numerous lacerations on the face.  The victim survived, but the victim had a long recovery.  


Thomas E. Perez, the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, stated: “The Justice Department continues to investigate and prosecute acts of violence targeting individuals because of their sexual orientation; this case is just another example of the department’s commitment to the pursuit of justice on behalf of all people regardless of their sexual preference or orientation.”  


Hall can receive a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison on top of the time he currently serving.  The Justice Department has not released any information about the length of this prior sentence.  


Perez went on to say, “The department will continue to vigorously enforce the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, and all the laws under our jurisdiction, to protect the rights of all individuals.”  


The FBI Dallas Division investigated the case.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Errin Martin and Trial Attorney Adriana Vieco of the Civil Rights Division were in charge of prosecution.  


Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Coercion

Coercion


What is the Coercion and Duress Defense?
In law, coercion and duress refers to a situation where an individual performs an act as a result of threat, violence, or other pressure against the individual. Duress is the pressure which is exerted upon an individual in order to coerce that individual to perform the act that would not be normally performed. 
Coercion and Duress has two main aspects. The first is that is that it negates the individual’s consent to an act, such as entering a contract or sexual activity. Second, it can be used a potential legal justification or defense for an act that would normally be considered unlawful. When coercion and duress is used as a defense, a defendant argues that he/she should not be considered liable for the act because, although the act was illegal, it was only done due to an extreme unlawful pressure. When coercion and duress is used in criminal law, a duress defense is very similar to a plea of guilty in the sense that the defendant admits partial culpability. In both of these defenses, the defense may not be accepted while the criminal act is.
Coercion and Duress can only qualify as a defense when:
The duress must be death or serious bodily harm
The harm threatened must be more than the harm of the crime
The duress must be inescapable and immediate
The defendant must not have any fault in becoming involved in the situation

Abandonment

Abandonment

What is Child Abandonment? 
The legal term abandonment has many different uses. In law, abandonment is the renunciation or relinquishment of a privilege, right, possession, claim, or interest, usually with the intent of never reasserting or resuming it again. This intentional action can take the form of discontinuance or a waiver. One type of abandonment is child abandonment, which is the practice of giving up or relinquishing claims and interests over an individual’s offspring with the intention of never reasserting or resuming them. Causes of child abandonment include many different cultural and social factors or mental illness.
One of the largest causes of child abandonment is poverty, particularly in cultures or societies with low quality social welfare systems where individuals are not financially capable of being financially responsible for child. Political conditions, such as difficult adoption proceedings or lack of proper institutions, can also contribute to child abandonment. Cultures or societies with liberal adoption laws and stable social structures often have lower child abandonment rates.
What is Considered Child Abandonment?
Child abandonment is categorized broadly to describe many different actions. Specific examples can vary, but some common actions that can result child abandonment include the following:
• Only minimally communicating and supporting a child
• Failing to maintain regular visitation with a child for at least a six month period
• Leaving an infant in a dumpster, trashcan, the side of the road, or a doorstep
• Not responding to a notice of child protective proceedings
• Unwillingness to provide support, supervision, or care for the child
• Not participating in a plan or program designed for parent/guardian reuniting with a child
• Leaving a child with another individual without meaningful communication for a three month period and without leaving proper provisions for support
• Absence from home for a time period that can create substantial risk of harm to a child
Child Abandonment Laws
Child abandonment laws differ on a state to state basis. Some states include child abandonment statutes in relation to the state’s child abuse while other states have specific laws that explicitly discuss child abandonment.
Most states consider child abandonment to be a felony, and can include situations where a guardian or parent physically abandons a child with the sole intent of giving up all rights and responsibilities of taking care of the child. Other states consider the act of child abandonment as a misdemeanor with smaller penalties and include situations of non-physical acts of abandonment.
In a criminal setting, the act of child abandonment can be defined as both the physical abandonment of a child, but can also include the emotional abandonment of a child by failing to provide the child with any necessary needs. For example, certain states consider it an act of child abandonment if a parent or guardian does not provide the necessary food, clothing, medical care, and shelter for a child. However, some other states will only penalize a parent or guardian for child abandonment only if the parent has the intention of abandoning a child.

Judgment

Judgment

What is a Legal Judgment
A judgment is the formal decision made by a judge or court after a lawsuit. At the same time the court make a judgment, they also may make a variety of court orders, such as giving a solution or remedy for a plaintiff in a civil matter, or imposing a sentence upon a defendant who is guilty in a criminal matter. A judgment states what party wins a case and what remedies they are rewarded, such as money damages or injunctive relief. A judgment also indicates the end of the court’s jurisdiction. 
Under the rules of civil procedure which govern practice in most state courts and federal courts in the United States, the entry of judgment is the last and final order entered by the court, leaving no additional action to be taken with respect to the issues argued by both parties to the lawsuit by the court. With only specific exceptions, final judgment is the only judgment subject to an appeal. 
A judgment from a court must be in writing and must show clearly that all the relevant issues have been discussed. It must also specifically the for and against parties, and any monetary judgments must be definite, explained with details, and expressed in words instead of numbers or figures. Any judgments regarding real property must also contain explicit descriptions of the realty in question.
After court makes a judgment, it has to be dated and docketed with the administrator’s office of the court.  A court can amend its judgment in order to fix ambiguities or inaccuracies that may cause misunderstanding, such as erroneous inclusions, or omissions. However, new parties cannot be added into the lawsuit through an amended judgment. According to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a judgment can be amended by a motion served within 10 days after the judgment is first entered. 
Different types of judgments are given depending process the court uses to make the final decision. There are different types of judgments:
Consent decree: A binding, final judicial judgment or decree which memorializes a voluntary agreement made between parties to a suit in return for the end of civil litigation or the withdrawal of a criminal charge or an end to a civil litigation. Typically, the defendant has already ceased conduct or agrees to cease the activity alleged by the plaintiff. A consent judgment also can memorialize the payment of damages. Consent judgments are most commonly used in family and criminal law, but can also be used in antitrust law. 
Declaratory judgment: A judgment in a civil case that declares the duties, obligations, or rights of at least one party in a dispute. This judgment is legally binding, but does not order a party of to complete any. A declaratory judgment is usually distinguished from an advisory opinion since the latter does not resolve a controversy or actual case. A court can issue a declaratory judgment by itself or with some other form of relief. 


Default judgment: A binding judgment in favor of one party based on a failure to take action by the opposing party. Typically, it in favor of a plaintiff if the defendant has not acknowledged or responded to a summons or has not appeared before a court of law. The failure to take action in court is the default. The judgment is the relief asked for in the in the party’s original petition, so initial pleadings tend to be extremely exaggerated.

Summary judgment: A determination made by the court without a full trial. In the United States, a summary judgment can be awarded before a trial by the court, effectively stating that a trial is unnecessary. This is often the result of a court finding that there are no disputes between the parties about the material facts and when looking at these facts, one party is clearly entitled to receive the judgment in their favor.

Vacated judgment: A judgment that makes a previous legal judgment void. This judgment is typically an appellate court’s judgment which reverses, sets aside, or overturns the lower court’s judgment.

House arrest

House arrest

What is House Arrest?
In law, house arrest is a measure by which an individual is confined to his or her residence by the authorities. House arrest is also sometimes called electronic monitoring, home confinement or home detention. When an individual is under house arrest, travel is usually severely restricted, if not completely forbidden. House arrest is usually used as a lenient prison time or juvenile-detention or prison time.
House arrest allows for an alternative to imprisonment and works to reduce re-offending while also trying to cut costs regarding growing prison numbers and rising costs. House arrest allows eligible offenders to keep or look for employment, maintain relationships and responsibilities with family, and attend programs designed for rehabilitation that contribute towards fixing the causes of the individuals offenses.
Many of these offenders have to wear an electronic sensor placed on the ankle, or an ankle bracelet. If the offender goes outside an allotted perimeter, the sensor alerts the ankle bracelet monitoring company about the activity of the bracelet. The company will then call the residence of the individual to check for any possible malfunction, or if the individual has left the perimeter. If the latter is the case, law enforcement and the authorities are notified in order to apprehend the person. It is also illegal to try to remove the ankle bracelet.
The terms of house arrest can vary, but offenders are very rarely confined to their residence for the entire day. Most house arrest programs allow offenders who are employed to continue work, and only confine themselves at home during non-working hours. These offenders are also often allowed to leave their residences for predetermined, specific purposes, such as visits to a police station or probation officer, religious reasons, or medical appointments.
Often, these programs allow the convict to leave the home during pre-approved regular times in order to take care of general household errands like laundry and food shopping. Offenders can also be responsible for maintaining communications with a higher authority to ensure that they are in fact following the terms of their house arrest. Exceptions are usually made to allow outside visitors to visit.
There are many types of house arrest, all which vary in severity depending on the requirements of the court order. For example, a court can set a curfew to restrict an offender from leaving their residences at certain times, such as hours of darkness. House arrest sometimes requires an offender to stay at home for most hours, excluding the predetermined exceptions. In the most severe cases of house arrest, the offender is under home incarceration, meaning an officer would constrain the offender to the residence at all time, aside from the times set for medical appointment sand court-sanctioned treatment programs. 
While house arrest can be used for common criminal cases when prison is not an appropriate measure, the term is more often used to refer to house confinement as a way of repression by an authoritarian government against a political dissident. In this situation the person under house arrest usually does not have any access to a means of communication. If communication is allowed electronically, conversations are typically monitored.

Theft

Theft

What is Theft?
Theft, which is legally synonymous with larceny, is the dishonest action of taking property that belongs to another person with the intention of permanently depriving the owner of the property. For the offense to be committed, all parts of the definition must be shown. 
There are two specific parts to a theft charge. First, there must be an actual act of taking, using, or moving something without the knowledge or permission of the true owner of the thing in question. Second, the individual moving or taking the item must fully know that the property belonged to someone else.  For example, in an individual takes an item belonging to another person mistakenly, it is not considered theft since there were no dishonest intentions. Theft can occur with many different types of property such:
Money
Movable property
Domestic animals
Gold, precious stones, valuable minerals
Documents or titles to land or real estate
Charges for theft or offenses regarding theft include different forms of theft such as shoplifting, pick-pocketing, purse-snatching, identity theft, motor vehicle theft, theft by fraud and deceit, theft of trade secrets, theft of rental property, theft by receiving, theft of fuel, theft by writing a bad check, theft of medical records, newspaper theft, or perhaps theft by resale of a coupon or lift ticket.  Depending on the jurisdiction, theft charges can be included also in other offenses such as robbery or burglary.  
 
In the United States, plenary regulation of theft only exists at the local state level, in the sense that the majority of thefts by default are prosecuted by the U.S. state in which the theft occurred. However, the federal government has narrowly criminalized certain categories of theft which have a direct effect on the federal agencies or on interstate commerce.
While many states in the United States have kept larceny as the main offense, a few states have also adopted theft provisions. In some states, repeat offenders who keep committing acts of theft can become subject to life in prison. 
As a general rule, nearly all legal systems distinguish between petty theft and grand theft depending on the value of the item that was stolen. For example, a person stealing a car would be charged with grand theft, since cars are generally valuable, while stealing someone’s shoes would be petty theft. In both situations, the thief expects to benefit in some way from the stolen object, while the original owner of the item suffers as a result of the loss of the object.

Types of Theft
There are also several different kinds of theft. For example, in a case of theft by trick, an individual tricks another individual into giving up an object which belongs to them. For example, an individual could pretend to be law enforcement and tell a victim that the item is being confiscated, but in reality the offender is stealing the item from the individual. There is also theft by false pretenses, for example by selling a stolen car while pretending that the offender is the true owner of the car. A third type of theft is theft by false promise, where the individual gives an item with the understanding that some sort of service will be provided in return, but the service is never actually rendered.
One of the defining characteristics of theft is that the act is nonviolent. Because of this, theft without violence is much less heavily punishable in comparison to a crime where the theft is accompanied with violence, like a robbery where violence occurs against the people or the property. 
Depending on the item stolen, the crime may not be referred to a simply a crime. For example, a theft of physical, tangible property is often called larceny. However, when theft occurs involving cases where intangible stealing occurs, such as fraud by engaging in financial transactions that are fraudulent, these actions are still considered theft, but not larceny.
The most common types of theft include the following:
Auto theft: The theft of a motor vehicle such as a car, truck, bus, motorcycle, golf cart, moped, or other motorized vehicles
Petty Theft:  The theft of object with a value that is beneath a certain limit. While the limit varies by state, it is often placed at $400.
Felony Theft: Also called grand theft. This theft is anything over a certain limit set by the state. It is typically over $4000.
Theft by Embezzlement: Theft that occurs when property has been entrusted to an individual is stolen. Individuals who have a relationship of trust or a fiduciary duty can be guilty of this form of theft.
Theft by Deception: Includes false pretenses, where an individual is deceived into giving up ownership of an item due to a lie, and larceny by trick, which a person is simply tricked into giving the property to the offender.
Theft by Possession: Theft that occurs by simply being in possession of stolen property, and knowing that it was stolen.
The Punishment of Theft
The specific punishment after being charged and proven of theft depends entirely on the laws of the specific state where the act occurred. Generally speaking, the crime of simple theft is more often considered a certain level of a misdemeanor, meaning that the offender cannot be punished by the court for the crime of theft for more than one year in jail. However, the severity of this punishment relies entirely on state’s laws. This includes both the fines the offender is subject to, and the time that may be spend in jail or community sentence .
However, in all states in the United States, the specific length of the maximum sentence for theft will increase based on the monetary value of the stolen property. For example, if all other circumstances were equal, the crime of theft of an item with the value of $500 would result in a longer maximum sentence than the theft of an item worth only $5. The specific monetary values and lengths of maximum sentence vary between states.
Furthermore, there are limits to the monetary value of the stolen item that changes the offense from a theft that is a misdemeanor to a felony.  A felony for theft can be punishable by a minimum of one year in prison, and a monetary amount that will vary between sates. Not unlike the misdemeanor theft charge, the property value is a very important fact in determining the maximum sentence for the crime between states. 

Attorneys, Get Listed

X