Home Criminal Page 20

Criminal

Scott Lee Peterson

Scott Lee Peterson

 

Scott Lee Peterson

Scott Lee Peterson is a convicted murderer currently incarcerated in California. He was tried and convicted in a case that began in June of 2004 and ended in March of 2005.

 

The murder case against Scott Lee Peterson began on Christmas Eve of 2002, when his wife Laci was reported as missing to the police. During the initial stages of the police investigation, her family stated their belief in the innocence of Scott Lee Peterson. However, police investigators when they learned that Scott Lee Peterson had been conducting an extramarital relationship with Amber Frey, a local massage therapist.

 

When police questioned Amber Frey, they learned that Scott Lee Peterson had misrepresented himself to her as a widower. Alarmed by this information, Amber Frey agreed to cooperate with the investigation and taped a number of phone conversations in an attempt to get Scott Lee Peterson to admit to his role in the disappearance of his wife. However, she was unsuccessful in her efforts.

 

In April of 2003, the upper half of the body of Laci Peterson and her fetus were found in a location north of a marina where Scott Lee Peterson had gone boating on the date of the disappearance of his wife.  An autopsy determined that Laci Peterson had had her ribs broken prior to her death. However, due to the advanced decomposition of the torso, it was impossible to determine the precise cause of death.

 

Scott Lee Peterson was subsequently arrested and charged with the murder of his wife. A police search of his boat determined that the only physical piece of evidence directly tying him to the death of his wife was a piece of her hair found on his boat tools. Therefore, the prosecution focused on the circumstantial evidence and testimony against Scott Lee Peterson. In presenting his motivation, they charged that Scott Lee Peterson murdered his wife in order to inherit her money and then marry Amber Frey. Expert witnesses called by the prosecution included a hydrologist with particular expertise in tides, who created a model timeline for how Scott Lee Peterson murdered and disposed of his wife on the water.

 

Defense attorneys called upon witnesses including Dr. Charles March, who testified that Laci Peterson's fetus died a week later than claimed by the prosecution. However, cross-examination revealed that the basis for this claim was anecdotal. The defense advanced several theories as to who the murderer was, including a prostitute who had been stealing checks from the Peterson mailbox, as well as advancing the hypothesis that Laci Peterson had been killed by a cult of Satanists. The defense also stressed the lack of direct evidence as making it impossible to convict Scott Lee Peterson with certainty beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

The jury convicted Scott Lee Peterson, who was then sentenced to the death penalty. A new appeal was filed in July of 2012.

Rochelle S. Berliner Finds Satisfaction in Switch to Criminal Defense

Rochelle S. Berliner Finds Satisfaction in Switch to Criminal Defense

Queens, New York—Some criminal defense attorneys start in the public defender's office, defending clients who don't have the money to afford their own lawyer.  Some, however, start on the other side of the criminal law fence, in the prosecutor's office.  Rochelle Berliner, a talented rising star in the criminal defense legal world, has been bringing her expertise from working with the D.A. to her job defending clients from all walks of life.

Berliner knew from the time she was in law school that she wanted to work in criminal law.  “The initial reason,” she said in an interview with laws.com, “was that criminal law offered something different each day.  Instead of working on a small piece of a very big case over a very long period of time, criminal law would allow me to be involved in multiple cases where the effects are almost immediate.”

(More on News at LAWS.com, Contact Alberto for interviews “support@laws.com”)

The instant gratification afforded by criminal practice was something that Berliner first encountered while working for the District Attorney's office for New York County, in the office of Special Narcotics.  Berliner felt that she was “making a contribution to society” in her prosecution job, while also having the opportunity to handle different cases every day.

Her switch over to the defense side of the law came in May 2005.  Opening her own criminal defense practice in Queens was a decision Berliner says she made for philosophical reasons.  “I knew I was ready to become a criminal defense attorney when I realized that the people I was prosecuting were human beings with families and futures,” she said.  “I realized that I could make more of a difference helping people repair their lives.”

Berliner says that it's hard to tell what percentage of potential clients who walk through her door she ends up defending, but says that there are things she won't do to get a client.  “I never sugar coat the truth,” she said.  “Those folks who want to be told what they want to hear—even if it is not the truth—will usually hire the person who tells them what they want to hear.  Folks who want the truth will trust me.”

As a criminal defense attorney, Berliner says she's happiest about “being able to fight for a person's rights and future and being successful at it.”  Her proudest moment on the defense side of the courtroom came when she represented two brothers who had been accused of selling drugs to undercover officers working for the New York Police Department.  

Berliner and her co-counsel brought video evidence to the court showing that the undercover officers had been lying about the events of the evening.  The video evidence resulted not only in the brothers' case being thrown out, but also the successful criminal prosecution of the police officers involved.  “The brothers then successfully sued the city for false arrest and other claims,” Berliner says—another example of how her firm is able to put things right when people have been unfairly prosecuted.

Providing representation for clients throughout the New York City area, Rochelle Berliner is an active member of the Queens County Bar Association and both the National and New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.  She also belongs to NORML, which attempts to lobby for the repeal of marijuana related criminal penalties, and the National Police Accountability Project.

To learn more about Rochelle Berliner please visit: https://www.rochelleberliner.com/

Coercion

Coercion


What is the Coercion and Duress Defense?
In law, coercion and duress refers to a situation where an individual performs an act as a result of threat, violence, or other pressure against the individual. Duress is the pressure which is exerted upon an individual in order to coerce that individual to perform the act that would not be normally performed. 
Coercion and Duress has two main aspects. The first is that is that it negates the individual’s consent to an act, such as entering a contract or sexual activity. Second, it can be used a potential legal justification or defense for an act that would normally be considered unlawful. When coercion and duress is used as a defense, a defendant argues that he/she should not be considered liable for the act because, although the act was illegal, it was only done due to an extreme unlawful pressure. When coercion and duress is used in criminal law, a duress defense is very similar to a plea of guilty in the sense that the defendant admits partial culpability. In both of these defenses, the defense may not be accepted while the criminal act is.
Coercion and Duress can only qualify as a defense when:
The duress must be death or serious bodily harm
The harm threatened must be more than the harm of the crime
The duress must be inescapable and immediate
The defendant must not have any fault in becoming involved in the situation

Abandonment

Abandonment

What is Child Abandonment? 
The legal term abandonment has many different uses. In law, abandonment is the renunciation or relinquishment of a privilege, right, possession, claim, or interest, usually with the intent of never reasserting or resuming it again. This intentional action can take the form of discontinuance or a waiver. One type of abandonment is child abandonment, which is the practice of giving up or relinquishing claims and interests over an individual’s offspring with the intention of never reasserting or resuming them. Causes of child abandonment include many different cultural and social factors or mental illness.
One of the largest causes of child abandonment is poverty, particularly in cultures or societies with low quality social welfare systems where individuals are not financially capable of being financially responsible for child. Political conditions, such as difficult adoption proceedings or lack of proper institutions, can also contribute to child abandonment. Cultures or societies with liberal adoption laws and stable social structures often have lower child abandonment rates.
What is Considered Child Abandonment?
Child abandonment is categorized broadly to describe many different actions. Specific examples can vary, but some common actions that can result child abandonment include the following:
• Only minimally communicating and supporting a child
• Failing to maintain regular visitation with a child for at least a six month period
• Leaving an infant in a dumpster, trashcan, the side of the road, or a doorstep
• Not responding to a notice of child protective proceedings
• Unwillingness to provide support, supervision, or care for the child
• Not participating in a plan or program designed for parent/guardian reuniting with a child
• Leaving a child with another individual without meaningful communication for a three month period and without leaving proper provisions for support
• Absence from home for a time period that can create substantial risk of harm to a child
Child Abandonment Laws
Child abandonment laws differ on a state to state basis. Some states include child abandonment statutes in relation to the state’s child abuse while other states have specific laws that explicitly discuss child abandonment.
Most states consider child abandonment to be a felony, and can include situations where a guardian or parent physically abandons a child with the sole intent of giving up all rights and responsibilities of taking care of the child. Other states consider the act of child abandonment as a misdemeanor with smaller penalties and include situations of non-physical acts of abandonment.
In a criminal setting, the act of child abandonment can be defined as both the physical abandonment of a child, but can also include the emotional abandonment of a child by failing to provide the child with any necessary needs. For example, certain states consider it an act of child abandonment if a parent or guardian does not provide the necessary food, clothing, medical care, and shelter for a child. However, some other states will only penalize a parent or guardian for child abandonment only if the parent has the intention of abandoning a child.

Judgment

Judgment

What is a Legal Judgment
A judgment is the formal decision made by a judge or court after a lawsuit. At the same time the court make a judgment, they also may make a variety of court orders, such as giving a solution or remedy for a plaintiff in a civil matter, or imposing a sentence upon a defendant who is guilty in a criminal matter. A judgment states what party wins a case and what remedies they are rewarded, such as money damages or injunctive relief. A judgment also indicates the end of the court’s jurisdiction. 
Under the rules of civil procedure which govern practice in most state courts and federal courts in the United States, the entry of judgment is the last and final order entered by the court, leaving no additional action to be taken with respect to the issues argued by both parties to the lawsuit by the court. With only specific exceptions, final judgment is the only judgment subject to an appeal. 
A judgment from a court must be in writing and must show clearly that all the relevant issues have been discussed. It must also specifically the for and against parties, and any monetary judgments must be definite, explained with details, and expressed in words instead of numbers or figures. Any judgments regarding real property must also contain explicit descriptions of the realty in question.
After court makes a judgment, it has to be dated and docketed with the administrator’s office of the court.  A court can amend its judgment in order to fix ambiguities or inaccuracies that may cause misunderstanding, such as erroneous inclusions, or omissions. However, new parties cannot be added into the lawsuit through an amended judgment. According to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a judgment can be amended by a motion served within 10 days after the judgment is first entered. 
Different types of judgments are given depending process the court uses to make the final decision. There are different types of judgments:
Consent decree: A binding, final judicial judgment or decree which memorializes a voluntary agreement made between parties to a suit in return for the end of civil litigation or the withdrawal of a criminal charge or an end to a civil litigation. Typically, the defendant has already ceased conduct or agrees to cease the activity alleged by the plaintiff. A consent judgment also can memorialize the payment of damages. Consent judgments are most commonly used in family and criminal law, but can also be used in antitrust law. 
Declaratory judgment: A judgment in a civil case that declares the duties, obligations, or rights of at least one party in a dispute. This judgment is legally binding, but does not order a party of to complete any. A declaratory judgment is usually distinguished from an advisory opinion since the latter does not resolve a controversy or actual case. A court can issue a declaratory judgment by itself or with some other form of relief. 


Default judgment: A binding judgment in favor of one party based on a failure to take action by the opposing party. Typically, it in favor of a plaintiff if the defendant has not acknowledged or responded to a summons or has not appeared before a court of law. The failure to take action in court is the default. The judgment is the relief asked for in the in the party’s original petition, so initial pleadings tend to be extremely exaggerated.

Summary judgment: A determination made by the court without a full trial. In the United States, a summary judgment can be awarded before a trial by the court, effectively stating that a trial is unnecessary. This is often the result of a court finding that there are no disputes between the parties about the material facts and when looking at these facts, one party is clearly entitled to receive the judgment in their favor.

Vacated judgment: A judgment that makes a previous legal judgment void. This judgment is typically an appellate court’s judgment which reverses, sets aside, or overturns the lower court’s judgment.

House arrest

House arrest

What is House Arrest?
In law, house arrest is a measure by which an individual is confined to his or her residence by the authorities. House arrest is also sometimes called electronic monitoring, home confinement or home detention. When an individual is under house arrest, travel is usually severely restricted, if not completely forbidden. House arrest is usually used as a lenient prison time or juvenile-detention or prison time.
House arrest allows for an alternative to imprisonment and works to reduce re-offending while also trying to cut costs regarding growing prison numbers and rising costs. House arrest allows eligible offenders to keep or look for employment, maintain relationships and responsibilities with family, and attend programs designed for rehabilitation that contribute towards fixing the causes of the individuals offenses.
Many of these offenders have to wear an electronic sensor placed on the ankle, or an ankle bracelet. If the offender goes outside an allotted perimeter, the sensor alerts the ankle bracelet monitoring company about the activity of the bracelet. The company will then call the residence of the individual to check for any possible malfunction, or if the individual has left the perimeter. If the latter is the case, law enforcement and the authorities are notified in order to apprehend the person. It is also illegal to try to remove the ankle bracelet.
The terms of house arrest can vary, but offenders are very rarely confined to their residence for the entire day. Most house arrest programs allow offenders who are employed to continue work, and only confine themselves at home during non-working hours. These offenders are also often allowed to leave their residences for predetermined, specific purposes, such as visits to a police station or probation officer, religious reasons, or medical appointments.
Often, these programs allow the convict to leave the home during pre-approved regular times in order to take care of general household errands like laundry and food shopping. Offenders can also be responsible for maintaining communications with a higher authority to ensure that they are in fact following the terms of their house arrest. Exceptions are usually made to allow outside visitors to visit.
There are many types of house arrest, all which vary in severity depending on the requirements of the court order. For example, a court can set a curfew to restrict an offender from leaving their residences at certain times, such as hours of darkness. House arrest sometimes requires an offender to stay at home for most hours, excluding the predetermined exceptions. In the most severe cases of house arrest, the offender is under home incarceration, meaning an officer would constrain the offender to the residence at all time, aside from the times set for medical appointment sand court-sanctioned treatment programs. 
While house arrest can be used for common criminal cases when prison is not an appropriate measure, the term is more often used to refer to house confinement as a way of repression by an authoritarian government against a political dissident. In this situation the person under house arrest usually does not have any access to a means of communication. If communication is allowed electronically, conversations are typically monitored.

Theft

Theft

What is Theft?
Theft, which is legally synonymous with larceny, is the dishonest action of taking property that belongs to another person with the intention of permanently depriving the owner of the property. For the offense to be committed, all parts of the definition must be shown. 
There are two specific parts to a theft charge. First, there must be an actual act of taking, using, or moving something without the knowledge or permission of the true owner of the thing in question. Second, the individual moving or taking the item must fully know that the property belonged to someone else.  For example, in an individual takes an item belonging to another person mistakenly, it is not considered theft since there were no dishonest intentions. Theft can occur with many different types of property such:
Money
Movable property
Domestic animals
Gold, precious stones, valuable minerals
Documents or titles to land or real estate
Charges for theft or offenses regarding theft include different forms of theft such as shoplifting, pick-pocketing, purse-snatching, identity theft, motor vehicle theft, theft by fraud and deceit, theft of trade secrets, theft of rental property, theft by receiving, theft of fuel, theft by writing a bad check, theft of medical records, newspaper theft, or perhaps theft by resale of a coupon or lift ticket.  Depending on the jurisdiction, theft charges can be included also in other offenses such as robbery or burglary.  
 
In the United States, plenary regulation of theft only exists at the local state level, in the sense that the majority of thefts by default are prosecuted by the U.S. state in which the theft occurred. However, the federal government has narrowly criminalized certain categories of theft which have a direct effect on the federal agencies or on interstate commerce.
While many states in the United States have kept larceny as the main offense, a few states have also adopted theft provisions. In some states, repeat offenders who keep committing acts of theft can become subject to life in prison. 
As a general rule, nearly all legal systems distinguish between petty theft and grand theft depending on the value of the item that was stolen. For example, a person stealing a car would be charged with grand theft, since cars are generally valuable, while stealing someone’s shoes would be petty theft. In both situations, the thief expects to benefit in some way from the stolen object, while the original owner of the item suffers as a result of the loss of the object.

Types of Theft
There are also several different kinds of theft. For example, in a case of theft by trick, an individual tricks another individual into giving up an object which belongs to them. For example, an individual could pretend to be law enforcement and tell a victim that the item is being confiscated, but in reality the offender is stealing the item from the individual. There is also theft by false pretenses, for example by selling a stolen car while pretending that the offender is the true owner of the car. A third type of theft is theft by false promise, where the individual gives an item with the understanding that some sort of service will be provided in return, but the service is never actually rendered.
One of the defining characteristics of theft is that the act is nonviolent. Because of this, theft without violence is much less heavily punishable in comparison to a crime where the theft is accompanied with violence, like a robbery where violence occurs against the people or the property. 
Depending on the item stolen, the crime may not be referred to a simply a crime. For example, a theft of physical, tangible property is often called larceny. However, when theft occurs involving cases where intangible stealing occurs, such as fraud by engaging in financial transactions that are fraudulent, these actions are still considered theft, but not larceny.
The most common types of theft include the following:
Auto theft: The theft of a motor vehicle such as a car, truck, bus, motorcycle, golf cart, moped, or other motorized vehicles
Petty Theft:  The theft of object with a value that is beneath a certain limit. While the limit varies by state, it is often placed at $400.
Felony Theft: Also called grand theft. This theft is anything over a certain limit set by the state. It is typically over $4000.
Theft by Embezzlement: Theft that occurs when property has been entrusted to an individual is stolen. Individuals who have a relationship of trust or a fiduciary duty can be guilty of this form of theft.
Theft by Deception: Includes false pretenses, where an individual is deceived into giving up ownership of an item due to a lie, and larceny by trick, which a person is simply tricked into giving the property to the offender.
Theft by Possession: Theft that occurs by simply being in possession of stolen property, and knowing that it was stolen.
The Punishment of Theft
The specific punishment after being charged and proven of theft depends entirely on the laws of the specific state where the act occurred. Generally speaking, the crime of simple theft is more often considered a certain level of a misdemeanor, meaning that the offender cannot be punished by the court for the crime of theft for more than one year in jail. However, the severity of this punishment relies entirely on state’s laws. This includes both the fines the offender is subject to, and the time that may be spend in jail or community sentence .
However, in all states in the United States, the specific length of the maximum sentence for theft will increase based on the monetary value of the stolen property. For example, if all other circumstances were equal, the crime of theft of an item with the value of $500 would result in a longer maximum sentence than the theft of an item worth only $5. The specific monetary values and lengths of maximum sentence vary between states.
Furthermore, there are limits to the monetary value of the stolen item that changes the offense from a theft that is a misdemeanor to a felony.  A felony for theft can be punishable by a minimum of one year in prison, and a monetary amount that will vary between sates. Not unlike the misdemeanor theft charge, the property value is a very important fact in determining the maximum sentence for the crime between states. 

Rights of the Accused

Rights of the Accused

Understand the Rights of the Accused

The Rights of the Accused is a group of political and civil rights that applies to an individual who is accused of a crime. The Rights of the Accused start when he or she is first arrested and charged to when the individual is either acquitted or convicted. The Rights of the accused are usually based on the idea of “innocent until proven guilty” and are a part of due process.

In the United States, the Rights of the Accused are guaranteed in the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. More specifically, these rights are seen in the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments. When a person is arrested and charged with a crime, the individual is guaranteed rights aimed at insuring that the proceedings which follow are fair.

The Writ of Habeas Corpus

In all criminal cases, the burden of proof to prove a case is on the government to justify an arrest and detention of a criminal suspect. Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution guarantees the opportunity of a writ of habeas corpus. This is a directive from a court that requires the government to justify the citizen’s imprisonment. Because this guarantee, the person cannot be held for more than a limited period of time without being charged formerly with a crime.

Trial by Jury

One of the most important rights in the Rights of the Accused of a person formally charged with a crime is the right to a trial by jury. This right of the accused is guaranteed in Article III of the United States Constitution as well as the Sixth Amendment. A person who is accused of a crime has the right to have their innocence or guilt determined by a panel made up of fellow-citizens. In a federal case, formal charges against the individual cannot even be filed unless a grand jury has first convened and issued an indictment against the person. Both the jury trial and grand jury are there to protect private citizens from police officers who are overzealous, or from judges and prosecutors. By interjecting the judgment and wisdom of other private citizens into the legal process, an effective check is created on the law enforcement and on the judicial system involved. While jury trials are a guaranteed right by the Constitution, there are many instances where trial can be conducted without a jury, such as an individual waiving his or her right to a jury trial.

Self-Incrimination

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution states that no individual shall be forced in a criminal case to be a witness against himself in the case. However, this does not mean that they can avoid testifying just to avoid embarrassment or a conviction. Instead, they must have a valid concern that a testimony will contribute to a conviction. Individuals accused of crimes as well as witnesses involved in legal proceedings will often use this right by claiming their Fifth Amendment rights or pleading the fifth.

Out of the different Rights of the Accused, this one is extremely fundamental to the system of constitutional rule. In many situations, an investigator or prosecutor will listen to an individual in exchange for immunity rather than trying to prosecute them based on a testimony. Prosecutors often grant immunity to individuals suspected of committing lesser crimes if the person’s testimony can help convict a more notable suspect of an even more serious crime.

Double Jeopardy

Under the Rights of the Accused, an individual accused of a crime is also protected from double jeopardy. This comes from the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution which states that no individual shall put on trial or charged for the same offense twice. For example, if the result of a trial by jury is an acquittal, no further legal action can be taken against the defendant for that specific crime. The exception to this occurs when a defendant challenges the guilty conviction and is then granted a new trial, but this is usually only granted if there was a procedural error in the first trial.

Another exception to the double jeopardy rule is that it is possible for an individual to be tried in criminal court for a certain crime and then be later sued in civil court for the damages caused by the same criminal act in question. The rules and laws that are applicable to the two legal systems are different enough that they are considered distinct in regards to the Fifth Amendment. Furthermore, an individual can also be tried for different crimes that were committed in the course of a specific action or set of actions. Because they are legally defined as separate crimes, a second trial would not go against the double jeopardy provision of the Rights of the Accused.

No Cruel or Unusual or Excess Punishments or Fines

Under the Eighth Amendment, the government is forbidden from imposing excessive fines, bail, or punishments which are “cruel and unusual”. Under the limitations created by the Constitution, punishments for crimes can include fines or incarceration, but cannot include physically harmful or excessively painful penalties like whippings or branding. The Supreme Court has also interpreted the Eighth Amendment to forbid imprisonment in inhumane or unsanitary conditions.

One of the most important and necessary standards the Supreme Court has created and applied in determining if a fine or punishment violates the Eighth Amendment is by using a test of proportionality. The Supreme Court has ruled that depending on the circumstances, the death penalty can be thought of as cruel and unusual punishment, but only in circumstances death not proportionate to the crime in question.

Search Warrants

The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution forbids the search or seizure of the private property of an individual without a warrant. This means that a government agent or police officer cannot simply enter a home in order to search it or seize evidence unless the proper authority of a judge has been received. When law enforcement is investigating a crime, the person must assemble enough substantial evidence to fully convince a judge that the violation of a person’s privacy and property is necessary and warranted. The standard for showing the need for a warrant is called probable cause.

Assistance Needed in Identifying San Diego Bank Robber

Assistance Needed in Identifying San Diego Bank Robber


On November 27, 2012, the FBI in San Diego and the San Diego Police Department asked the public for information on an unidentified man who robbed a US Bank inside a Vons grocery store on November 27, 2012.  


The FBI announced that the man is suspected in one robbery but may be linked to other robberies as well.  


The robbery occurred around 4:33 p.m. on Tuesday, November 27, 2012.  The US Bank was located in the Vons grocery store on 5555 Balboa Avenue in San Diego, California.  The man entered the doors on the east side of the store, approached the teller, and sat down in a chair in front of the teller’s station.  


The man proceeded to pull out an envelope and a piece of paper with writing inscribed on it.  The piece of paper appeared to be a demand note because the teller looked at the note, put a sum of money in the envelope, and returned the envelope to the unidentified man.  After the man received the money, he stood up, walked away from the teller’s station, and left the store through the doors on the west side.


Nobody was hurt during the robbery.  


The man is described as Caucasian, about 30 years old, 5’6” to 5’10” tall, and about 130 to 140 pounds.  He had brown hair during the robbery and had a brown goatee.  He was wearing a blue baseball cap with yellow letters, a dark coat, a gray T-shirt, and light blue jeans.


If anyone has information about the robbery or suspect, they should call the FBI at (858) 565-1255 or Crime Stoppers at (888) 580-8477.  Individuals are discouraged from approaching a suspect by themselves or with the help of other people because the suspect may be armed and dangerous.  


Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation
 

Mint Hill Fire Chief to Plead Guilty of Public Corruption

Mint Hill Fire Chief to Plead Guilty of Public Corruption


On November 27, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina announced that Jeremy K Russell, the former fire chief of Mint Hill Volunteer Fire Department, agreed to plead guilty for embezzling over $225,000 from the Town of Mint Hill and the Fire Department.  


According to the charge filed in the U.S. District Court in Charlotte, Russell engaged in the embezzlement scheme from May 2010 to April 2012.  During the scheme, Russell set up a sham corporation called “Regional Medic & First Responder Supply Connection” and opened a bank account in Regional Medic’s name that he controlled himself.  He also created a mail drop for Regional Medic so mail wasn’t sent to his address.  


Court documents show that Russell filed fake invoices for services and equipment from Regional Medic that were never provided to the Mint Hill Fire Department.  The invoices were usually under $5,000 and the checks were signed off by members of the town and Fire Department employees.  


When Russell received the checks in the mail drop, he took them to the bank and deposited them in Regional Medic’s name.  By engaging in the scheme, Russell was able to obtain over $225,000 in under two years.  The Mint Hill Volunteer Fire Department is supported by taxpayer money and receives over $10,000 in federal funds as well.  


Russell used the embezzled money for personal expenditures and a gambling habit.  As part of the plea agreement, Russell will plead guilty to the embezzlement charge and pay restitution to victims.  


Embezzlement carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine up to $250,000.  The date of Russell’s plea hearing is not yet scheduled.  


The case was investigated by the FBI and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kurt W. Meyers.  


Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Attorneys, Get Listed

X