Home Criminal Page 22

Criminal

Self Incrimination

Self Incrimination

The Fifth Amendment of the constitution protects those accused of a crime from making statements that could be used against them in criminal court.  Those accused of a crime, despite this right, often incriminate themselves, without their knowledge, by making statements to the police.  It is advisable to make any statements only in the presence of a lawyer, to prevent implicating or incriminating oneself.
What is the legal precedent for the prohibition on self-incrimination?
The landmark legal case, Miranda v. Arizona, requires officers to inform suspects of their protection against self-incrimination, specifically their “right to remain silent.”  Statements made prior to being informed of the right to remain silent and have an attorney present are inadmissible in court.  Subsequent court decisions, such as Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010) decided in the Supreme Court, has ruled that voluntary statements made by the suspect in police custody after being informed of Miranda rights can be interpreted as a waiver of those rights, making the statements admissible in determining the suspect’s guilt.
What are self-incriminating statements?
Any statement where the suspect admits to certain actions of behaviors can be used to incriminate them.  For instance, one that is questioned over the murder of a relative and admits to not being fond of that relative has uttered a self-incriminating statement.  This is not nearly enough to tie the individual to the murder, but is enough to establish motive.  Self-incriminating statements have been used a number of times to convict individuals for crimes, even if those statements do not constitute a confession or there is insufficient evidence.  Self-incriminating statements can also be made during police interrogations.  Police are allowed to lie and make false promises to coax a suspect into self-incrimination, thus necessitating the presence of a lawyer during police interrogations.
What should one do in police custody?
After you are informed of your Miranda rights, your only obligation to talk to the police is to identify yourself by stating your name and handing over identification.  Failure for the police to inform you of your Miranda rights is sufficient to invalidate an entire criminal case.  The right against self-incrimination does not cover finger printing as well as blood and other DNA tests and you must submit to these tests as requested.  Do not make any other statements without the presence of an attorney.
What is “pleading the Fifth”?
Pleading the fifth is the refusal to testify as the testimony entered can be used to implicate the witness in criminal actions.  This right is waived if the witness answers any questions posed by the prosecution.  If the witness is subpoenaed to testify, the witness may choose to answer no questions.  Witnesses cannot be charged with contempt of court for refusing to answer questions.  It is best to consult with an attorney prior to testifying to ensure that you will not make a self-incriminating statement.  When pleasing the Fifth, you must choose to answer all questions or answer no questions.  One cannot selectively chose questions to answer when testifying.

Teen Confesses to Hate Crime

Teen Confesses to Hate Crime

Months after the jury’s deliberation proved fruitless in determining guilt, a Southern California teen plead guilty for murdering his gay classmate three years ago in their junior high classroom. 
In September, a judge declared a mistrial in the case of Brandon McInerney, now aged 17, after jurors claimed a deadlock following the nine-week trial on whether he should be found guilty for manslaughter or murder. Following the announcement of a stalemate, the Ventura County District Attorney’s Office announced that McInerney would be retried on first-degree murder charges—McInerney was tried as an adult in both cases.
 McInerney eventually plead guilty to killing classmate Lawrence King as well as using a firearm in the crime. McInerney will serve 11 years for manslaughter and another 10 for using a firearm to gun-down his classmate. The plead ultimately reduced the teen’s sentence by at least 20 years—he would have served a maximum sentence of 50 years to life in prison had he not confessed. 
McInerney was just 14 when he brought a handgun, belonging to one of his relatives, to E.O. Green Junior High School in Oxnard. 
McInerney shot the 15-year-old King twice at point-blank range in the back of the head, while the two students—along with their 24 classmates–were writing papers in a computer lab for their English teacher.
King, who was habitually bullied, was proud of being openly homosexual. He often wore jewelry and makeup to school and added high-heeled boots to his school uniform. He requested to be called Leticia instead of Larry. 
McInerney’s motivation stemmed from King’s eccentricity. McInerney was often a subject of harassment because King openly talked about liking McInerney. 
The Ventura County district attorney’s office acknowledged criticism regarding its decision to try the then 15-year-old as an adult. The office, however, stood by its decision, citing the juvenile system’s inadequacies of trying a case this severe. 
King’s father, Greg, described the plea as “bittersweet”, claiming he didn’t think the sentence matched the crime but understood the court’s decision. 

What are the Rights Of The Accused

What are the Rights Of The Accused

The rights of the accused are a specific category, or class, of civil and political rights that specifically apply to individuals who have been accused of a crime. The rights of the accused were a legal set of rights that have a philosophical heritage that dates back to the Enlightenment era. These rights are largely derived from the idea that an individual is “innocent until proven guilty.”

 

The rights of the accused come into effect when an individual is first arrested, although some of these commence as soon as an individual is taken into police custody. The rights of the accused continue throughout until the end of the trial, terminating, with two exceptions, at conviction or acquittal.

 

The rights of the accused that are in effect while in police custody or while awaiting trial are:

·      The right of due process,

·      Protection from Illegal searches and seizures

·      The right to indictment before a grand jury,

·      Protection against self-incrimination,

·      Protections against being testified against by a spouse,

·      The right to a fair trial,

·      The right to a speedy trial,

·      The right to a public trial,

·      The right of habeas corpus,

·      The right to a trial by jury, also known as the right to be tried by a jury of one’s peers,

·      The right to notice of accusation, meaning the right to know the nature and cause of the accusation,

·      The right to confront one’s accuser,

·      The right to counsel,

·      and protection against excessive bails, fines, and cruel and unusual punishment.

 

The protection against excessive bails, fines, and cruel and unusual punishment continues even after conviction. After acquittal, the accused gains protection against double jeopardy, meaning they cannot be charged twice for the same crime.

 

Iranian Man Tried to Export US Military Antennas

Iranian Man Tried to Export US Military Antennas


On November 20, 2012, Immigration and Customers Enforcement (ICE) reported that Amin Ravan of Iran was charged for conspiring to defraud the United States, smuggling, and violation of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA).  He unlawfully exported 55 military antennas from the United States to Singapore and Hong Kong with intentions of bringing the antennas back to Iran.  


The United States is currently trying to extradite Ravan from Malaysia for a trial in Washington.  He faces up to 20 years in prison for violating the AECA, 10 years in prison for smuggling, and five years in prison for conspiracy.  


The indictment alleges that Ravan tried to export military antennas from a company in Massachusetts from 2006 to 2007.  Ravan was denied the purchase at first, but he soon worked with two co-defendants at a company called Corezing in Singapore.  The defendants worked in a way that would deter transactional delays enforced by the Iran embargo.  The antennas were eventually exported to Corezing in Singapore and Hong Kong in July and September of 2007.  The antennas were purchased for $86,750.  


Lim Kow Seng (Eric Lim) and Hia Soo Gan Benson (Benson Hia) are the co-defendants.  The co-defendants were charged in a separate indictment for exporting the military antennas to Singapore and Hong Kong, and the United States is currently seeking their extradition from Singapore.  


Ravan, Seng, or Benson never received a license from the State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.  The licenses were required to export the antennas from the United States to either country.  


The investigation was led by ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) in Boston, the FBI in Minneapolis, and the Office of Export Enforcement under the Department of Commerce in Chicago and Boston.  Assistance was provided by the Department of Defense, Customs and Border Protection, the State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, and the Justice Department.  


Source: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Maverick County Commissioner Arrested by Federal Agents

Maverick County Commissioner Arrested by Federal Agents


On October 18, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas announced that federal authorities arrested Maverick County Commissioner Rodolfo Heredia and two other defendants for money laundering and a bulk cash smuggling scheme.  


The scheme occurred when a vehicle was sold to a known member of the Los Zetas Drug Trafficking Organization in Eagle Pass, Texas.


The indictment has charged Heredia, 54, Jose Luis Aguilar, 62, and David Gelacio, 28, with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, one count of aiding and abetting money laundering, one count of conspiring to commit bulk cash smuggling, and one count of aiding and abetting the smuggling of bulk cash.  


The indictment describes the incident that occurred on January 4, 2011.  Heredia and Aguilar traveled to a ranch in Mexico that is owned by a member of the Los Zetas Drug Trafficking Organization.  Heredia sold his Ford F-250 King Ranch truck for $13,000.  Aguilar was then given $7,000 and Gelacio was given $6,000.  The two men concealed the money as they crossed the Eagle Pass Port of Entry, and the two men returned the funds to Heredia while keeping a percentage for smuggling the cash.  


Each of the men faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for each money laundering charge.  Each face a maximum penalty of five years in prison for each bulk cash smuggling charge.  Each of the men is being held in detention until their hearing on October 23, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in front of U.S. Magistrate Judge Collis White.  


The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Texas Department of Public Safety investigated the case.  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Michael Galdo.


All of the defendants are presumed as innocent until proven guilty.  


Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation
 

Man Operated Illegal Gambling Operation in Chinatown, DC

Man Operated Illegal Gambling Operation in Chinatown, DC


On October 16, 2012, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that Chun Liu pleaded guilty in a District Court for the District of Columbia for operating an illegal gambling business.  The investigation was led by ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations.  

Liu is guilty on one count of conducting an illegal gambling business and one count of money laundering.  He is scheduled for sentencing on January 24, 2013.  Liu is subject to five years in prison for operating the illegal gambling business.  The maximum sentence for money laundering is 20 years.  ICE reports that Liu will likely receive 12 to 18 months in prison once he is sentenced.  


Liu has agreed to forfeit $255,320 as part of the plea agreement.  The amount represents the total proceeds he gained from operating the illegal gambling business.  Law enforcement seized more than $230,000 in cash when they searched the property in September of 2011, and the seized money will go towards the amount Liu is forfeiting.  


Court documents indicate that Liu and others were operating a total of three illegal gambling businesses throughout Chinatown in Washington, D.C.  The illegal gambling occurred from March 2007 to October 2011.  


Throughout March to December in 2007, Liu managed an illegal gambling business on the 800 block of Sixth Street NW.  He then moved the establishment and allowed illegal gambling from April 2009 to December 2009 on the same block.  He moved the illegal gambling business a third time to the 500 block of H Street NW and operated the business from February to March of 2010.  He moved the illegal gambling business one more time to the original property on Sixth Street NW.  


The illegal gambling was open continuously from 9 a.m. to 4 a.m., and Liu used the proceeds to make rental payments, make payments on his Mercedes, and pay other bills as well.


Source: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
 

Serial Bank Robber Receives 6 Life Sentences

Serial Bank Robber Receives 6 Life Sentences


On October 17, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Virginia announced that James Louis Whittlesey was sentenced for five counts of aggravated bank robbery, two gun charges, and one count of attempted escape.  Whittlesey is a violent and serial offender.  He robbed five banks in three different states, shot a gun at a police officer, fled the country, and even tried to escape federal custody.


Whittlesey’s crimes began on July 19, 2011 at the M&T Bank in Fawn Grove, Pennsylvania.  He brandished a revolver and demanded money from the tellers.  Then, on July 27, Whittlesey robbed a Citizen’s Bank in Willow Street, Pennsylvania.  He pointed the revolver at the tellers and told them he’d kill them if they tampered with the money.  


The next crime occurred on August 12 at the M&T Bank in Wilmington, Delaware.  During the robbery, he brandished the revolver again, gave a duffel bag to the teller, and said, “No change, big bills, no BS.”  The fourth robbery occurred at the M&T Bank in Lemoyne, Pennsylvania on October 7.  The flashed the revolver and demanded large bills.  


The last robbery occurred on October 14 in Winchester.  After he received the money, he was approached by police when he left the bank.  He fired several shots at a police officer before fleeing in a vehicle.  He ditched the vehicle and avoided apprehension by hiding in a drainage pipe.  Whittlesey hitchhiked to Interstate 81, traveled to Maryland, stole a car, and then drove to Vermont.  He crossed the border into Canada—presumably on foot—and was arrested in Montreal on December 11.


U.S. Attorney Timothy J. Heaphy stated, “Mr. Whittlesey is a violent, desperate man whose crime spree endangered communities up and down the East Coast.  Today’s sentence is a harsh but just result for someone who brazenly fired at a police lieutenant in Winchester, Virginia, and then fled to Canada.”


Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation
 

Man Attempts to Bomb New York Federal Reserve Bank

Man Attempts to Bomb New York Federal Reserve Bank


There was a ghostly feeling in New York City yesterday on October 16, 2012.  The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York announced that the FBI was successful in thwarting the attempted bombing by Bangladeshi national Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis (Nafis).  The man, with suspected ties to al Qaeda, attempted to build a 1,000 pound bomb and detonate it next to the New York Federal Reserve Bank in lower Manhattan.  


Court documents indicate Nafis planned to take out several high ranking officials and the New York Stock Exchange, but he ultimately decided to bomb the Federal Reserve Bank because he believed the best way to “destroy America” was to target its economy.  


While the plans were just beginning on U.S. soil, Nafis was approached by an FBI undercover agent who acted as an al Qaeda member.  The undercover agent supplied Nafis with between 20 and 50 pound bags of fake explosives, and Nafis constructed a bomb after he bought other detonating devices and conducted surveillance in lower Manhattan.  


On the morning of the attempted bombing, Nafis met with the agent and they began to drive to a warehouse in the Eastern District of New York.  He explained he had a second plan in case the police were trying to stop the bombing.  When they arrived at the warehouse, Nafis attempted to make a 1,000 bomb out of fertilizer.  He loaded the material in the van and the drove to New York Federal Reserve Bank.  


During the drive, he armed the device and eventually parked the van next to the Bank.  Nafis and the undercover agent walked across the street to a hotel where Nafis then recorded a video statement that stated, “We will not stop until we attain victory or martyrdom.”  He tried to detonate the bomb by using his cell phone, but the attempted detonation was unsuccessful.  He was arrested immediately.  


Nafis is charged with attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and attempting to provide information to al Qaeda.  


FBI Acting Assistant Director in Charge Mary E. Galligan stated, “It is important to emphasize that the public was never at risk in this case, because two of the defendant’s ‘accomplices’ were actually an FBI source and an FBI undercover agent.  The FBI continues to place the highest priority on preventing acts of terrorism.”


Source:  Federal Bureau of Investigation

Former Philadelphia Detective Guilty of Drug Charges

Former Philadelphia Detective Guilty of Drug Charges

 

On October 9, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania announced that Keith Gidelson of Philadelphia pleaded guilty to charges for conspiring to distribute anabolic steroids.  Gidelson was a former detective for the Philadelphia Police Department.  According to the FBI, Gidelson ran a distribution ring for anabolic steroids and human growth hormone (HGH) around the Philadelphia area.  In order to hide his involvement, he acquired the steroids from foreign suppliers and sold the drugs to co-conspirators who later sold the drugs to customers.  
 
The FBI reports that Gidelson received shipments containing the anabolic steroids from suppliers in China and Europe.  The one supplier mailed the steroids to California where Robert Walters, a co-defendant, repackaged the steroids and shipped the drugs to Gidelson in Philadelphia.  
 
The second supplier shipped the orders to a mailbox Gidelson rented from the UPS store.  After receiving the drug, he would store the packages at his home in Philadelphia.  He then met with customers at their homes and numerous fitness clubs around the Philadelphia area in order to distribute the steroids.  
 
The customers include the following defendants: Michael Barclay, Keith Ebner, Jeffrey Filoon, Christian Kowalko, Joel Levin, Luke Lors, Joseph McIntyre, George Sambuca, William Schiavo, and Vaidotas Verikas.  
 
The FBI also reports that Gidelson met other customers in different parts of the United States by accessing weightlifting chat rooms and websites.  He used websites like steroids.com, inject.com, isteroids.com, and bodybuilding.com.  He then used encrypted emails to place orders for the steroids from the foreign suppliers.  
 
Gidelson faces a maximum sentence for each charge of 10 years in prison, two years to a lifetime of supervised release, and a $500,000 fine. 
 
The case was investigated by the DEA, FBI, the Philadelphia Police Department, and the United States Postal Inspection Service.  
 
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Man Used Stolen Police Uniform to Kidnap Family

Man Used Stolen Police Uniform to Kidnap Family

 

On October 9, 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado announced that Tracy Morgan of Denver received a sentence of 50 years in federal prison after he kidnapped a family at gunpoint and demanded a ransom.  Two other defendants, Killiu Ford of Aurora and Augustus Sanford of Denver, are still awaiting sentencing.  
 
The indictment and evidence during the trial found that the defendants unlawfully seized, confined, and kidnapped an adult male, an adult female, and two children.  They then held the victims for a ransom.  The defendants planned to plant a GPS tracking system on the victim’s car after calling the victim for a delivery of cocaine.  After the delivery was made, the defendants were able to find out where the victim and his family lived.  
 
Around 11 p.m. on September 22, 2009, the defendants approached as the male and female were placing their daughters into their car.  The defendants exited numerous vehicles, drew their guns, and stated they were police officers.  Sanford ordered the female to get into the passenger seat, and Sanford proceed to get into the driver’s seat.  He then drove the female and her two children to their home in Thornton.  
 
All of the defendants eventually reached the house and began searching for drugs and money.  When the female victim announced she knew nothing of the money and drugs, one of the men grabbed a child and pointed a gun at their head.  The female victim then pointed the men to the money and they grabbed about $30,000 in cash.  They fled and pushed the male victim out of the car on 104th Avenue.  
 
The two other defendants face a mandatory minimum of 25 years in jail for kidnapping the children.  They face up to 20 years in prison for kidnapping the adult victims, and they face multiple $250,000 fines.  They also face a minimum of 25 years for kidnapping while using the cell phone, internet, and GPS.  
 
U.S. Attorney John Walsh stated, “Federal authorities are relentless in tracking down and prosecuting those who commit this crime.  This 600 month sentence serves as a warning to all would-be kidnappers and also a reminder that harming a victim would bring even more severe consequences.” 
 
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Attorneys, Get Listed

X